ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2014
Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05798624 (To Study the Impact of a Previous Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
To Study the Impact of a Previous Cesarean Section (CS) With / Without an Isthmocele on the Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in Single Euploid Frozen Embryo Transfer
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uterine closure after cesarean delivery: surgical technique, biological rationale, and clinical implications.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Review
- ART outcome after euploid frozen embryo transfer is not affected by previous Cesarean section delivery in the absence of intracavitary fluid.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Determinants associated with high-risk fertility behaviours among reproductive aged women in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Parameters in Canines After Cesarean Sections.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- The impact of Severe Maternal Morbidity on probability of subsequent birth in a population-based study of women in California from 1997-2017.Annals of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Fertility intentions and the way they change following birth- a prospective longitudinal study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Brief Report: Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Fecundability.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
study questionWhen compared with vaginal delivery, is Cesarean delivery associated with reduced childbearing, a prolonged inter-birth interval or infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women whose first delivery was by Cesarean section were not significantly different from those who delivered vaginally with respect to subsequent deliveries, inter-birth interval or infertility after delivery. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Some studies have suggested that delivery by Cesarean section reduces subsequent fertility, while others have reported no association. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a planned secondary analysis of the Mothers' Outcomes After Delivery study, a longitudinal cohort study. This analysis included 956 women with 1835 deliveries, who completed a study questionnaire at 6-11 years (median [interquartile range]: 8.1 [7.1, 9.8]) after their first delivery. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsExclusion criteria regarding the first birth were: maternal age <15 or >50 years, delivery at <37 weeks gestation, placenta previa, multiple gestation, known fetal congenital abnormality, stillbirth, prior myomectomy and abruption. Of the 956 women included, the first delivery was by Cesarean section for 534 women and by vaginal birth for 422 women. Infertility was self-reported. To compare maternal characteristics by mode of first delivery, P-values were calculated using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's χ(2) test for categorical variables and a Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous variables. We also considered whether, across all deliveries to date, a prior Cesarean is associated with decreased fertility. In this analysis, self-reported infertility after each delivery (across all participants) was considered as a function of one or more prior Cesarean births, using generalized estimating equations to control for within-woman correlation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No differences were observed between the Cesarean and vaginal groups (for first delivery) with respect to infertility after their most recent delivery (7 versus 6%, P = 0.597), the interval between their first and second births (30.8 versus 30.6 months, P = 0.872), or multiparity (75 versus 76%, P = 0.650). Across all births, a history of Cesarean delivery was not significantly associated with infertility (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.26). Women who reported infertility prior to their first delivery were significantly more likely to report infertility after each subsequent delivery (OR, 5.16; 95% CI, 3.60-7.39). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the use of self-reported infertility, the fertility status of some participants may be misclassified. Also, the small sample size may result in insufficient power to detect small differences between groups. Finally, a relatively high proportion of our participants were over age 35 at the time of first delivery (26%) and highly educated (37% with graduate degrees), which may indicate that our population may not be generalizable. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsWhile some prior studies have shown decreased family size among women who deliver by Cesarean, our results suggest that the rate of infertility is not different after Cesarean compared with vaginal birth. Our findings should be reassuring to women who deliver by Cesarean section. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH, R01-HD056275). No competing interests are declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.