Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25164023›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2014

Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility.

E C Evers, K C McDermott, J L Blomquist, V L Handa

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05798624 (To Study the Impact of a Previous Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05798624 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

To Study the Impact of a Previous Cesarean Section (CS) With / Without an Isthmocele on the Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in Single Euploid Frozen Embryo Transfer

TypeobservationalSponsorART Fertility Clinics LLCRan2023 to 2025Enrolled1,050ConditionsInfertility, ImplantationArmsUltrasound between 6+0 and 6+7 weeks of pregnancy - With Isthmocele, Ultrasound between 6+0 and 6+7 weeks of pregnancy - Without Isthmocele, Ultrasound between 6+0 and 6+7 weeks of pregnancy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Parameters in Canines After Cesarean Sections.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E C EversDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 4940 Eastern Avenue, 301 Building, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA eevers2@jhmi.edu.
K C McDermottDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J L BlomquistDepartment of Gynecology, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, 6701 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21204, USA.
V L HandaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 4940 Eastern Avenue, 301 Building, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USGreater Baltimore Medical Center · US

Funding

Cesarean and vaginal birth: cohort study of the impact on pelvic floor disordersR01HD056275 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HANDA, VICTORIA LYNN · 2008 to 2017
$5.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD056275NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD056275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhen compared with vaginal delivery, is Cesarean delivery associated with reduced childbearing, a prolonged inter-birth interval or infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women whose first delivery was by Cesarean section were not significantly different from those who delivered vaginally with respect to subsequent deliveries, inter-birth interval or infertility after delivery. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Some studies have suggested that delivery by Cesarean section reduces subsequent fertility, while others have reported no association. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a planned secondary analysis of the Mothers' Outcomes After Delivery study, a longitudinal cohort study. This analysis included 956 women with 1835 deliveries, who completed a study questionnaire at 6-11 years (median [interquartile range]: 8.1 [7.1, 9.8]) after their first delivery. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsExclusion criteria regarding the first birth were: maternal age <15 or >50 years, delivery at <37 weeks gestation, placenta previa, multiple gestation, known fetal congenital abnormality, stillbirth, prior myomectomy and abruption. Of the 956 women included, the first delivery was by Cesarean section for 534 women and by vaginal birth for 422 women. Infertility was self-reported. To compare maternal characteristics by mode of first delivery, P-values were calculated using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's χ(2) test for categorical variables and a Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous variables. We also considered whether, across all deliveries to date, a prior Cesarean is associated with decreased fertility. In this analysis, self-reported infertility after each delivery (across all participants) was considered as a function of one or more prior Cesarean births, using generalized estimating equations to control for within-woman correlation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No differences were observed between the Cesarean and vaginal groups (for first delivery) with respect to infertility after their most recent delivery (7 versus 6%, P = 0.597), the interval between their first and second births (30.8 versus 30.6 months, P = 0.872), or multiparity (75 versus 76%, P = 0.650). Across all births, a history of Cesarean delivery was not significantly associated with infertility (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.26). Women who reported infertility prior to their first delivery were significantly more likely to report infertility after each subsequent delivery (OR, 5.16; 95% CI, 3.60-7.39). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the use of self-reported infertility, the fertility status of some participants may be misclassified. Also, the small sample size may result in insufficient power to detect small differences between groups. Finally, a relatively high proportion of our participants were over age 35 at the time of first delivery (26%) and highly educated (37% with graduate degrees), which may indicate that our population may not be generalizable. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsWhile some prior studies have shown decreased family size among women who deliver by Cesarean, our results suggest that the rate of infertility is not different after Cesarean compared with vaginal birth. Our findings should be reassuring to women who deliver by Cesarean section. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH, R01-HD056275). No competing interests are declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFertilityHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCesarean sectionchildbearingfertilityinter-birth intervalreproduction

Identifiers

PMID25164023
PMCPMC4191449
OpenAlexW1987354984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.