ArticleBMC genomics2014
Genomic landscape and evolutionary dynamics of mariner transposable elements within the Drosophila genus.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence for dual pathways of Tc1/mariner domestication in Drosophila.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Recent horizontal transfer of transposable elements inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Dynamic Regulation of Gonadal Transposons and Pseudogenes via PIWI/piRNA Pathway in Gynogenetic Japanese Flounder (Biology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary History of the DD41D Family of Tc1/Mariner Transposons in Two Mayetiola Species.Biochemical genetics · 2025Article
- Closing the Gap: Horizontal Transfer ofBiology · 2022Article
- Population-scale long-read sequencing uncovers transposable elements associated with gene expression variation and adaptive signatures in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Gene drives gaining speed.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Genome-wide characterization of Mariner-like transposons and their derived MITEs in the Whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Characterization of Mariner transposons in seven species of Rhus gall aphids.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The genomic survey of Tc1-like elements in the silkworm microsporidia Nosema bombycis.Acta parasitologica · 2020Article
- Complex Evolutionary History of Mboumar, a Mariner Element Widely Represented in Ant Genomes.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Homology-Free Detection of Transposable Elements Unveils Their Dynamics in Three Ecologically DistinctGenes · 2020Article
- Review
- Characterization of Human Dosage-Sensitive Transcription Factor Genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Rapid Expansion of a Highly Germline-Expressed Mariner Element Acquired by Horizontal Transfer in the Fire Ant Genome.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Diversity and evolution of mariner-like elements in aphid genomes.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Article
- Regulated complex assembly safeguards the fidelity of Sleeping Beauty transposition.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Transposable elements inMobile genetic elements · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe mariner family of transposable elements is one of the most widespread in the Metazoa. It is subdivided into several subfamilies that do not mirror the phylogeny of these species, suggesting an ancient diversification. Previous hybridization and PCR studies allowed a partial survey of mariner diversity in the Metazoa. In this work, we used a comparative genomics approach to access the genus-wide diversity and evolution of mariner transposable elements in twenty Drosophila sequenced genomes.
resultsWe identified 36 different mariner lineages belonging to six distinct subfamilies, including a subfamily not described previously. Wide variation in lineage abundance and copy number were observed among species and among mariner lineages, suggesting continuous turn-over. Most mariner lineages are inactive and contain a high proportion of damaged copies. We showed that, in addition to substitutions that rapidly inactivate copies, internal deletion is a major mechanism contributing to element decay and the generation of non-autonomous sublineages. Hence, 23% of copies correspond to several Miniature Inverted-repeat Transposable Elements (MITE) sublineages, the first ever described in Drosophila for mariner. In the most successful MITEs, internal deletion is often associated with internal rearrangement, which sheds light on the process of MITE origin. The estimation of the transposition rates over time revealed that all lineages followed a similar progression consisting of a rapid amplification burst followed by a rapid decrease in transposition. We detected some instances of multiple or ongoing transposition bursts. Different amplification times were observed for mariner lineages shared by different species, a finding best explained by either horizontal transmission or a reactivation process. Different lineages within one species have also amplified at different times, corresponding to successive invasions. Finally, we detected a preference for insertion into short TA-rich regions, which appears to be specific to some subfamilies.
conclusionsThis analysis is the first comprehensive survey of this family of transposable elements at a genus scale. It provides precise measures of the different evolutionary processes that were hypothesized previously for this family based on PCR data analysis. mariner lineages were observed at almost all "life cycle" stages: recent amplification, subsequent decay and potential (re)-invasion or invasion of genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.