Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25163547›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2014

Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study).

Gijsbert D Musters, Willem A Bemelman, Robbert J I Bosker, Jacobus W A Burger, Peter van Duijvendijk, Boudewijn van Etten, Anna A W van Geloven, Eelco J R de Graaf, Christiaan Hoff, Niels de Korte and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01927497 (Long-term Results of Biological Mesh Closure of the Pelvic Floor After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01927497 phase3completednot on this map

Long-term Results of Biological Mesh Closure of the Pelvic Floor After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2013 to 2015Enrolled104ConditionsRectal CancerArmsBiological mesh assisted perineal closure, Primary perineal closure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is there a place for a biological mesh in perineal hernia repair?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Gijsbert D Musters
Willem A Bemelman
Robbert J I Bosker
Jacobus W A Burger
Peter van Duijvendijk
Boudewijn van Etten
Anna A W van Geloven
Eelco J R de Graaf
Christiaan Hoff
Niels de Korte
Jeroen W A Leijtens
Harm J T Rutten
Baljit Singh
Anthony van de Ven
Ronald J C L M Vuylsteke
Johannes H W de Wilt
Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
Pieter J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, Amsterdam 1105AZ, The Netherlands. P.J.Tanis@amc.nl.
University of Amsterdam · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLFlevoziekenhuis · NLGelre Hospitals · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLLaurentius Ziekenhuis · NLLeicester General Hospital · GBMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLTergooi · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost of increased rates of perineal wound healing problems and perineal hernia. This has progressively increased the use of biological meshes, although not supported by sufficient evidence. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction using a biological mesh after standardized eAPR with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure. METHODS/

designIn this multicentre randomized controlled trial, patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary rectal cancer who are scheduled for eAPR after neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy will be considered eligible. Exclusion criteria are prior radiotherapy, sacral resection above S4/S5, allergy to pig products or polysorbate, collagen disorders, and severe systemic diseases affecting wound healing, except for diabetes. After informed consent, 104 patients will be randomized between standard care using primary wound closure of the perineum and the experimental arm consisting of suturing a biological mesh derived from porcine dermis in the pelvic floor defect, followed by perineal closure similar to the control arm. Patients will be followed for one year after the intervention and outcome assessors and patients will be blinded for the study treatment. The primary endpoint is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing, defined as a Southampton wound score of less than II on day 30. Secondary endpoints are hospital stay, incidence of perineal hernia, quality of life, and costs. DISCUSSION: The BIOPEX-study is the first randomized controlled multicentre study to determine the additive value of using a biological mesh for perineal wound closure after eAPR with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure with regard to perineal wound healing and the occurrence of perineal hernia. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01927497 (Clinicaltrial.gov).

Indexed as

BioprosthesisSurgical MeshCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMalePelvic FloorPerineumPlastic Surgery ProceduresRectal NeoplasmsSingle-Blind MethodSurgical Wound DehiscenceWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID25163547
PMCPMC4158342
OpenAlexW2012853326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.