Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25163419›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2015

3'-deoxy-3'-[¹⁸F]-fluorothymidine PET/CT in early determination of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer: comparison with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/CT.

Haojun Chen, Yimin Li, Hua Wu, Long Sun, Qin Lin, Long Zhao, Hanxiang An

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Long-term prognostic value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. The Prognostic Value of SequentialWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inclusion of PET-CT into planning of primary or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of esophageal cancer improves prognosis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation ofEJNMMI research · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for predicting tumor response to radiochemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haojun ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Xiamen Cancer Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China, leochen0821@stu.xmu.edu.cn.
Yimin Li
Hua Wu
Long Sun
Qin Lin
Long Zhao
Hanxiang An

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this work was to investigate the prognostic value of response analysis using early 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) PET/CT in esophageal squamous cancer patients and make a comparison with [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: For 34 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer, both (18)F-FLT PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at baseline (pre), 4 weeks after the start of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (interim), and 2 weeks after therapy completion (final). SUVmax1, SUVmax2, and SUVmax3 represent SUVmax (SUV: standard uptake values) measured on the pre, interim, and final scans, respectively. GTVFLT-PET and GTVFDG-PET (GTV: gross tumor volume) were measured on the pre and interim scans. ΔSUV/ΔGTV represents the fractional changes of SUVmax/GTV between two different time points. PET parameters were evaluated for correlations with outcome.

resultsRegarding (18)F-FLT PET/CT, according to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, parameters for predicting 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LRC) showed the highest area under curve (AUC) on interim (18)F-FLT PET/CT scans (ΔSUV12, AUC of 0.812 for PFS, 0.775 for LRC, with a cutoff of 60 %; P = 0.008), compared with the parameters on pre and final scans. Patients with a ΔSUV12 greater than 60 %, who were defined as interim PET-negative group, were associated with better 2-year PFS and LRC than the interim PET-positive group (PFS: 70.6 % vs. 35.2 %, P = 0.025; LRC: 84.2 % vs 52.9, P = 0.046). In terms of (18)F-FDG PET/CT, ΔSUV13 on the final 18F-FDG PET/CT scan demonstrated better prediction (AUC of 0.812 for PFS, 0.807 for LRC, with a cutoff of 75 %; P = 0.016) than the parameters on pre and interim scans. An SUVmax decrease ≥ 75 % on the final (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan was associated with better clinical outcome (PFS: 73.3 % vs. 36.8 %, P = 0.022; LRC: 86.7 % vs 52.6, P = 0.029). These correlations were most prominent in the subgroup of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

conclusionEarly interim (18)F-FLT PET/CT is a significant predictor of 2-year PFS and LRC, which is correlated better with early responses and late outcomes than interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal squamous cancer patients.

Indexed as

DideoxynucleosidesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingalovudineDideoxynucleosidesFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.