Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25162713›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Zhixuan Zhang, Ting Wang, Jun Zhang, Xiaohong Cai, Changchuan Pan, Yu Long, Jing Chen, Chengya Zhou, Xude Yin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03951233 (Genotyping K-RAS and EGFR in Greek Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03951233 completednot on this map

Genotyping K-RAS and EGFR in Greek Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients: Incidence, Significance and Treatment Implications

TypeobservationalSponsorHellenic Cooperative Oncology GroupRan2000 to 2014Enrolled424ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. GenotypingCancer genomics & proteomics
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ResectedTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Article
  9. Prognostic Role ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Real-World Survival Outcomes Based onJTO clinical and research reports · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhixuan ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Ting WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Xiaohong CaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Changchuan PanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Yu LongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Chengya ZhouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Xude YinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess its role.

methodsStudies were identified via an electronic search on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for meta-analysis.

resultsThere were 16 evaluated studies (n  =  3337) in the meta-analysis. The combined HR evaluating EGFR mutations on disease free survival was 0.96 (95% CI [0.79-1.16] P  =  0.65). The combined HR evaluating EGFR mutations on overall survival was 0.86 (95% CI [0.72-1.04] P  = 0.12). The subgroup analysis based on univariate and multivariate analyses in DFS and OS showed no statistically significant difference. There was also no statistically significant difference in DFS and OS of stage I NSCLC patients.

conclusionThe systematic review with meta-analysis showed that EGFR mutations were not a prognostic factor in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer. Well designed prospective study is needed to confirm the result.

Indexed as

MutationCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsGene ExpressionHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSurvival AnalysisErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID25162713
PMCPMC4146589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.