Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25162631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Funding infectious disease research: a systematic analysis of UK research investments by funders 1997-2010.

Joseph R Fitchett, Michael G Head, Mary K Cooke, Fatima B Wurie, Rifat Atun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Involving citizens in priority setting for public health research: Implementation in infection research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph R FitchettKing's College London, Department of Infectious Diseases, London, United Kingdom.
Michael G HeadUniversity College London, Department of Infection and Population Health, UCL Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Mary K CookeUniversity College London, Department of Infection and Population Health, UCL Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Fatima B WurieUniversity College London, Department of Infection and Population Health, UCL Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Rifat AtunImperial College Business School and the Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom; Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch investments are essential to address the burden of disease, however allocation of limited resources is poorly documented. We systematically reviewed the investments awarded by funding organisations to UK institutions and their global partners for infectious disease research. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsPublic and philanthropic investments for the period 1997 to 2010 were included. We categorised studies by infectious disease, cross-cutting theme, and by research and development value chain, reflecting the type of science. We identified 6165 funded studies, with a total research investment of UK £2.6 billion. Public organisations provided £1.4 billion (54.0%) of investments compared with £1.1 billion (42.4%) by philanthropic organisations. Global health studies represented an investment of £928 million (35.7%). The Wellcome Trust was the leading investor with £688 million (26.5%), closely followed by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) with £673 million (25.9%). Funding over time was volatile, ranging from ∼£40 million to ∼£160 million per year for philanthropic organisations and ∼£30 million to ∼£230 million for public funders. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Infectious disease research funding requires global coordination and strategic long-term vision. Our analysis demonstrates the diversity and inconsistent patterns in investment, with volatility in annual funding amounts and limited investment for product development and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Financial SupportBiomedical ResearchCommunicable DiseasesCooperative BehaviorHumansInvestmentsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25162631
PMCPMC4146508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.