Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25162594›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The MEC1 and MEC2 lines represent two CLL subclones in different stages of progression towards prolymphocytic leukemia.

Eahsan Rasul, Daniel Salamon, Noemi Nagy, Benjamin Leveau, Ferenc Banati, Kalman Szenthe, Anita Koroknai, Janos Minarovits, George Klein, Eva Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eahsan RasulDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Instititet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel SalamonDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Instititet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Noemi NagyDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Instititet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Benjamin LeveauDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Instititet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ferenc BanatiRT-Europe Nonprofit Research Ltd, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary.
Kalman SzentheRT-Europe Nonprofit Research Ltd, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary.
Anita KoroknaiMicrobiological Research Group, National Center for Epidemiology, Budapest, Hungary.
Janos MinarovitsMicrobiological Research Group, National Center for Epidemiology, Budapest, Hungary; University of Szeged, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Biology and Experimental Dental Research, Szeged, Hungary.
George KleinDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Instititet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva KleinDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Instititet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EBV carrying lines MEC1 and MEC2 were established earlier from explants of blood derived cells of a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patient at different stages of progression to prolymphocytoid transformation (PLL). This pair of lines is unique in several respects. Their common clonal origin was proven by the rearrangement of the immunoglobulin genes. The cells were driven to proliferation in vitro by the same indigenous EBV strain. They are phenotypically different and represent subsequent subclones emerging in the CLL population. Furthermore they reflect the clinical progression of the disease. We emphasize that the support for the expression of the EBV encoded growth program is an important differentiation marker of the CLL cells of origin that was shared by the two subclones. It can be surmised that proliferation of EBV carrying cells in vitro, but not in vivo, reflects the efficient surveillance that functions even in the severe leukemic condition. The MEC1 line arose before the aggressive clinical stage from an EBV carrying cell within the subclone that was in the early prolymphocytic transformation stage while the MEC2 line originated one year later, from the subsequent subclone with overt PLL characteristics. At this time the disease was disseminated and the blood lymphocyte count was considerably elevated. The EBV induced proliferation of the MEC cells belonging to the subclones with markers of PLL agrees with earlier reports in which cells of PLL disease were infected in vitro and immortalized to LCL. They prove also that the expression of EBV encoded set of proteins can be determined at the event of infection. This pair of lines is particularly important as they provide in vitro cells that represent the subclonal evolution of the CLL disease. Furthermore, the phenotype of the MEC1 cells shares several characteristics of ex vivo CLL cells.

Indexed as

BiomarkersB-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationClonal EvolutionClone CellsDisease ProgressionEpstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensGene ExpressionHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellLeukemia, ProlymphocyticLymphocyte CountTime FactorsViral Matrix ProteinsBiomarkersEBNA-2 protein, Human herpesvirus 4EBV-associated membrane antigen, Epstein-Barr virusEpstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensViral Matrix ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25162594
PMCPMC4146575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.