Trial reportPloS one2014
Binocular glaucomatous visual field loss and its impact on visual exploration--a supermarket study.
Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual field loss and vision-related quality of life in the Italian Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Study.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- Gaze behavior in open-angle glaucoma patients during visuo-cognitive-motor tasks: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Physical Activity Is Associated with Improved Visuomotor Processing in Older Adults with Moderate and Advanced Glaucomatous Visual Field Defect: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Eye Movement Abnormalities in Glaucoma Patients: A Review.Eye and brain · 2022Review
- Functional Field of View Determined by Crowding, Aging, or Glaucoma Under Divided Attention.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Periphery kinetic perimetry: clinically feasible to complement central static perimetry.BMC ophthalmology · 2021Observational
- The importance of peripheral vision when searching 3D real-world scenes: A gaze-contingent study in virtual reality.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Gait in Elderly Glaucoma: Impact of Lighting Conditions, Changes in Lighting, and Fear of Falling.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Rationale and protocol for the 7- and 8-year longitudinal assessments of eye health in a cohort of young adults in the Raine Study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Glaucoma-Related Differences in Gaze Behavior When Negotiating Obstacles.Translational vision science & technology · 2018Article
- The effect of concentric constriction of the visual field to 10 and 15 degrees on simulated motor vehicle accidents.PloS one · 2018Article
- Impact of Glaucoma and Dry Eye on Text-Based Searching.Translational vision science & technology · 2017Article
- Eye-Tracking as a Tool to Evaluate Functional Ability in Everyday Tasks in Glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmology · 2017Review
- Adaptive Gaze Strategies for Locomotion with Constricted Visual Field.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- Effect of glaucoma on eye movement patterns and laboratory-based hazard detection ability.PloS one · 2017Article
- Living with glaucoma: a qualitative study of functional implications and patients' coping behaviours.BMC ophthalmology · 2015Article
- An assessment of driving fitness in patients with visual impairment to understand the elevated risk of motor vehicle accidents.BMJ open · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced glaucomatous visual field loss may critically interfere with quality of life. The purpose of this study was to (i) assess the impact of binocular glaucomatous visual field loss on a supermarket search task as an example of everyday living activities, (ii) to identify factors influencing the performance, and (iii) to investigate the related compensatory mechanisms. Ten patients with binocular glaucoma (GP), and ten healthy-sighted control subjects (GC) were asked to collect twenty different products chosen randomly in two supermarket racks as quickly as possible. The task performance was rated as "passed" or "failed" with regard to the time per correctly collected item. Based on the performance of control subjects, the threshold value for failing the task was defined as μ+3σ (in seconds per correctly collected item). Eye movements were recorded by means of a mobile eye tracker. Eight out of ten patients with glaucoma and all control subjects passed the task. Patients who failed the task needed significantly longer time (111.47 s ±12.12 s) to complete the task than patients who passed (64.45 s ±13.36 s, t-test, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients who passed the task showed a significantly higher number of glances towards the visual field defect (VFD) area than patients who failed (t-test, p < 0.05). According to these results, glaucoma patients with defects in the binocular visual field display on average longer search times in a naturalistic supermarket task. However, a considerable number of patients, who compensate by frequent glancing towards the VFD, showed successful task performance. Therefore, systematic exploration of the VFD area seems to be a "time-effective" compensatory mechanism during the present supermarket task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.