ReviewBiopreservation and biobanking2014
The use of biospecimens in population-based research: a review of the National Cancer Institute's Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences grant portfolio.
Review in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Live Primary Prostate Cancer Cell Research in Veterans.Cancer research communications · 2026Pooled it
- Current Assessment of Existing Biospecimen Use in Population-Based Cancer Research.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2026Article
- Strategies to build trustworthiness and increase diversity in colorectal cancer biospecimen research: a multi-phase, multi-site qualitative study.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Implementation of a comprehensive fertility biobanking initiative.F&S science · 2022Article
- Establishing a reproductive biorepository for basic and translational research: experience developing the reproductive subjects registry and sample repository.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Recommendations for a Dutch Sustainable Biobanking Environment.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2021Article
- How Semantics Connotations May Influence Concerns About Donation of Biospecimens.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2021Article
- Biochemically Tracked Variability of Blood Plasma Thawed-State Exposure Times in a Multisite Collection Study.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2020Article
- The Scale, Collections, and Biospecimen Distribution of Grade A Tertiary Hospital Biobanks in China: A National Survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Delta-S-Cys-Albumin: A Lab Test that Quantifies Cumulative Exposure of Archived Human Blood Plasma and Serum Samples to Thawed Conditions.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- Critical Financial Challenges for Biobanking: Report of a National Cancer Institute Study.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2019Article
- Survivorship in Neuro-Oncology.Neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Tumor Specimen Biobanks: Data Gaps for Analyzing Health Inequities-the Case of Breast Cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2018Article
- Brain tumor biobanking in the precision medicine era: building a high-quality resource for translational research in neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology practice · 2017Review
- The PLCO Biorepository: Creating, Maintaining, and Administering a Unique Biospecimen Resource.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, researchers have increasingly used human biospecimens to evaluate hypotheses related to disease risk, outcomes and treatment. We conducted an analysis of population-science cancer research grants funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to gain a more comprehensive understanding of biospecimens and common derivatives involved in those studies and identify opportunities for advancing the field. Data available for 1,018 extramural, peer-reviewed grants (active as of July 2012) supported by the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (DCCPS), the NCI Division that supports cancer control and population-science extramural research grants, were analyzed. 455 of the grants were determined to involve biospecimens or derivatives. The most common specimen types included were whole blood (51% of grants), serum or plasma (40%), tissue (39%), and the biospecimen derivative, DNA (66%). While use of biospecimens in molecular epidemiology has become common, biospecimens for behavioral and social research is emerging, as observed in our analysis. Additionally, we found the majority of grants were using already existing biospecimens (63%). Grants that involved use of existing biospecimens resulted in lower costs (studies that used existing serum/plasma biospecimens were 4.2 times less expensive) and more publications per year (1.4 times) than grants collecting new biospecimens. This analysis serves as a first step at understanding the types of biospecimen collections supported by NCI DCCPS. There is room to encourage increased use of archived biospecimens and new collections of rarer specimen and cancer types, as well as for behavioral and social research. To facilitate these efforts, we are working to better catalogue our funded resources and make that data available to the extramural community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.