Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25161614›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2014

What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia.

Charles-Edouard Notredame, Delphine Pins, Sophie Deneve, Renaud Jardri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The glare illusion in individuals with schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Faster bi-stable visual switching in psychosis.Translational psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles-Edouard NotredamePediatric Psychiatry Department, University Medical Centre of Lille Lille, France ; SCA-Lab, PSYCHIC Team, Université Lille Nord de France Lille, France.
Delphine PinsSCA-Lab, PSYCHIC Team, Université Lille Nord de France Lille, France.
Sophie DeneveGroup for Neural Theory, INSERM U960, Institute of Cognitive Studies, École Normale Supérieure Paris, France.
Renaud JardriPediatric Psychiatry Department, University Medical Centre of Lille Lille, France ; SCA-Lab, PSYCHIC Team, Université Lille Nord de France Lille, France ; Group for Neural Theory, INSERM U960, Institute of Cognitive Studies, École Normale Supérieure Paris, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illusion, namely a mismatch between the objective and perceived properties of an object present in the environment, is a common feature of visual perception, both in normal and pathological conditions. This makes illusion a valuable tool with which to explore normal perception and its impairments. Although still debated, the hypothesis of a modified, and typically diminished, susceptibility to illusions in schizophrenia patients is supported by a growing number of studies. The current paper aimed to review how illusions have been used to explore and reveal the core features of visual perception in schizophrenia from a psychophysical, neurophysiological and functional point of view. We propose an integration of these findings into a common hierarchical Bayesian inference framework. The Bayesian formalism considers perception as the optimal combination between sensory evidence and prior knowledge, thereby highlighting the interweaving of perceptions and beliefs. Notably, it offers a holistic and convincing explanation for the perceptual changes observed in schizophrenia that might be ideally tested using illusory paradigms, as well as potential paths to explore neural mechanisms. Implications for psychopathology (in terms of positive symptoms, subjective experience or behavior disruptions) are critically discussed.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferencedelusionshallucinationsillusionspredictive codingpsychosisschizophreniavisual perception

Identifiers

PMID25161614
PMCPMC4130106
OpenAlexW2049841753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.