Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25161364›Full record

ReviewThe application of clinical genetics2014

The genetic basis of Lynch syndrome and its implications for clinical practice and risk management.

Stephanie A Cohen, Anna Leininger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The application of clinical genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic testing to guide screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a microsimulation model.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie A CohenCancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, St Vincent Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Anna LeiningerMinnesota Oncology, Woodbury, MN, USA.
Minnesota Oncology · USSaint Vincent Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary colon cancer, and accounts for as much as 3% of all colon and endometrial cancers. The identification and management of individuals with Lynch syndrome have evolved over the past 20 years, yet the syndrome remains vastly underdiagnosed. It is important for clinicians to recognize individuals and families who are at risk in order to be able to manage them appropriately and reduce their morbidity and mortality from this condition. This review will touch on the history of Lynch syndrome, the current knowledge of genotype-phenotype correlations, the cancers associated with Lynch syndrome, and management of individuals who are gene carriers.

Indexed as

hereditary cancerhereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancerimmunohistochemistryLynch syndromemicrosatellite instabilitymismatch repairmismatch repair genes

Identifiers

PMID25161364
PMCPMC4142571
OpenAlexW1999283442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.