ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2014
Metal preferences and metallation.
Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
180 citing papers in PubMed, 371 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cervicovaginal lavage fluid iron and manganese levels in women with and without vaginitis.BMC women's health · 2026Trial
- Article
- Heavy Metal-Driven Oral Dysbiosis: Salivary Toxicometallomics at the Host-Microbiome Interface Across Pathologies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Immunoblot-based activity assay for heme-containing histidine kinases.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2026Article
- The trypanosome mRNA decapping enzyme ALPH1 prefers caps without m7G methylation and produces diphosphate RNA.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- An enzyme's metal preference evolves through redox modulation driven by the cofactor's secondary coordination sphere.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Metal oxide nanoparticles: emerging stars in biomedical application.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026Review
- Ruthenium Complexes in Protein Science: Heading a New Generation of Therapeutic and Analytical Tools.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Review
- A Glimpse in the Metal Ion Selectivity Rules: Zn(II), Cd(II) and Co(II) Interplay With Different Protein Coordination Spheres in Determining Variable Thermal Stability and Folding Scenarios.Bioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2026Article
- Navigating Transition Metal-Dependent Cell Death: Mechanisms, Crosstalk, and Future Directions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Microbial metal physiology: ions to ecosystems.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- Effects of MgBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- The E. coli escape wave in response to external ZnBiometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of Metallomic Studies: Revealing the Toxic Metal Burden in Tobacco Smokers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Forging biofilms: metal-induced microbial responses in biofilm formation.Journal of bacteriology · 2025Review
- Unimodal Imaging of Monovalent Metal-Chelator Complexes and Lipids by MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- Zinc-metallochaperones ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Structural investigations connect the disordered N-terminal extension of HypB to the activities of HypB and SlyD in E. coli.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Bacteria Under Metal Stress-Molecular Mechanisms of Metal Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The metal binding preferences of most metalloproteins do not match their metal requirements. Thus, metallation of an estimated 30% of metalloenzymes is aided by metal delivery systems, with ∼ 25% acquiring preassembled metal cofactors. The remaining ∼ 70% are presumed to compete for metals from buffered metal pools. Metallation is further aided by maintaining the relative concentrations of these pools as an inverse function of the stabilities of the respective metal complexes. For example, magnesium enzymes always prefer to bind zinc, and these metals dominate the metalloenzymes without metal delivery systems. Therefore, the buffered concentration of zinc is held at least a million-fold below magnesium inside most cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.