ArticleObesity surgery2015
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Portomesenteric Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 101,914 Patients.Obesity surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Symmetric three-port laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a novel technique that is safe, effective, and feasible.Surgery today · 2023Article
- Left Hypochondrium or Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Severe Obesity: Surgical Technique and Results of a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Center.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Short-term outcomes of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Severe Obesity: Review and Perspectives.Obesity surgery · 2020Review
- Consecutive Versus Selective Primary and Revisional Single Incision Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: Personal Experience in 330 Cases.Obesity surgery · 2020Article
- Retrospective Comparison of Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2018Article
- Task performance in standard laparoscopy in comparison with single-incision laparoscopy in a modified skills trainer.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Weight-loss outcomes of SPIDER(®) sleeve gastrectomy at 6 months compared to traditional laparoscopic technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Single Incision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Review.Obesity surgery · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleeve gastrectomy has become an established primary bariatric surgical technique. Its relatively lower complexity has made it eligible to be performed by single-incision laparoscopy (single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, SILSG). The aim of this paper is to present our SILSG technique and surgical outcomes and demonstrate that SILSG is a safe and feasible procedure using conventional laparoscopic instruments.
methodsAll patients who underwent SILSG since December 2012 in our institution were analyzed. The operative technique involved creation of a transumbilical incision and the introduction of a GelPoint device with four trocars. Rigid instruments were used in all patients. Gastric transection was performed 4 cm proximal to the pylorus and calibrated with a 36-Fr bougie. Hemostasis of the staple line was achieved with metallic clips.
resultsA total of 74 patients underwent SILSG. Their mean age and body mass index were 34.2 ± 9.2 years and 34.0 ± 3.2 kg/m(2) (range 30.0-42.7 kg/m(2)), respectively. The mean operative time was 48 ± 10 min. No reoperations or deaths occurred. One patient developed portal vein thrombosis. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.4 ± 2.0 days. The cosmetic result was satisfactory in all patients.
conclusionsSILSG is a safe and feasible procedure when performed with the technique described herein. This technique allows for the use of conventional laparoscopic instruments and reasonable operative times. The main benefit of the procedure is an excellent cosmetic result with virtually no visible scars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25160092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.