Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25159658›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015

Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer.

Hiroyuki Kashiwagi, Kenta Kumagai, Eiji Monma, Mutsumi Nozue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05035446 (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of the Short-term Efficacy of Single-hole Plus One-hole Total Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Five-hole Total Laparoscopic Surgery for Distal Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05035446 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of the Short-term Efficacy of Single-hole Plus One-hole Total Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Five-hole Total Laparoscopic Surgery for Distal Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFujian Cancer HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsSurgeryArmssingle-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Safety and Feasibility of Single-Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2016
    Review
  13. Morgagni hernia treated by reduced port surgery.International journal of surgery case reports · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroyuki KashiwagiDepartment of Surgery, Shonai Amarume Hospital, Shouyou 1-1-1, Shonai Town, Higashi-Tagawa, 999-7782, Japan, hiroyukiwagi1967@yahoo.co.jp.
Kenta Kumagai
Eiji Monma
Mutsumi Nozue
Shonan Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough recent trends in laparoscopic procedures have been toward minimizing the number of incisions, four or five ports are normally required to complete laparoscopic gastrectomy because of the complexity of this procedure. Multi-channel ports, such as the SILS port (Covidien, JAPAN), are now available and are crucial for performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) or reduced port surgery (RPS). We carried out reduced port distal gastrectomy (RPDG) using a dual-port method with a SILS port.

methodsTen patients who were diagnosed as early stage gastric cancer were offered the RPDG. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 68.1 and 21.4, respectively. No distant metastasis or regional lymph node swelling was seen in any case. A 5-mm flexible scope (Olympus, JAPAN) and SILS port were used and a nylon ligature with a straight needle, instead of a surgical instrument, was available to raise the gastric wall.

resultsThe average operative time was 266.9 ± 38.3 min and blood loss was 37.8 ± 56.8 ml. Patients recovered well and experienced no complications after surgery. All patients could tolerate soft meals on the first day after surgery and the average hospital stay was 8.1 days. Past conventional LAG cases were evaluated to compare the short-term outcome and no difference was seen in the mean operative time or operative blood loss. The length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter for the RPDG group than the conventional operation group (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, the trend of serum CRP elevation after surgery was lower in the RPDG group than the conventional LAG group (p = 0.053).

conclusionsAlthough the benefits of RPS have not been established, this type of surgery may be expected to have some advantages. Cosmetic benefits and shorter hospital stays are clear advantages. Less invasiveness can be expected according to the trend of serum CRP elevation after RPDG.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisLaparoscopesAgedAged, 80 and overEquipment DesignFemaleGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedStomach NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25159658
PMCPMC4422851
OpenAlexW2079902237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.