Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25159276›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2014

Gene therapy for the nervous system: challenges and new strategies.

Casey A Maguire, Servio H Ramirez, Steven F Merkel, Miguel Sena-Esteves, Xandra O Breakefield

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. State-of-the-art therapies for fragile X syndrome.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2024
    Review
  9. Nanoparticle-based Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Disorders.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Casey A MaguireDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Neuroscience Program, Harvard Medical School, Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, 13th Street, Building 149, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA, cmaguire@mgh.harvard.edu.
Servio H Ramirez
Steven F Merkel
Miguel Sena-Esteves
Xandra O Breakefield
Massachusetts General Hospital · USTemple University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

The role of microvesicles in giloma virotherapyP01CA069246 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHIOCCA, E. ANTONIO · 1996 to 2021
$30.9M
TRAINING PROGRAM: DRUGS OF ABUSE RELATED NEUROPEPTIDEST32DA007237 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ELLEN M UNTERWALD · 1988 to 2026
$10.6M
Transfer of microRNA regulators from glioblastoma to brain microenvironment U19CA179563 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BREAKEFIELD, XANDRA OWENS, CHAREST, ALAIN · 2013 to 2017
$8.6M
Novel serological biomarkers for BBB dysfunction during HIV-1 infectionR01NS086570 · NINDS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI RAMIREZ, SERVIO HEYBERT · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
A hybrid microvesicle/virus vector for targeted gene transfer to the brainR21NS081374 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MAGUIRE, CASEY A · 2012 to 2013
$449k
NCI NIH HHS CA069246NCI NIH HHS P01 CA069246NCI NIH HHS U19 CA179563NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007237NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086570NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086570-01NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS081374NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS081374-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current clinical treatments for central nervous system (CNS) diseases, such as Parkinson's disease and glioblastoma do not halt disease progression and have significant treatment morbidities. Gene therapy has the potential to "permanently" correct disease by bringing in a normal gene to correct a mutant gene deficiency, knocking down mRNA of mutant alleles, and inducing cell-death in cancer cells using transgenes encoding apoptosis-inducing proteins. Promising results in clinical trials of eye disease (Leber's congenital aumorosis) and Parkinson's disease have shown that gene-based neurotherapeutics have great potential. The recent development of genome editing technology, such as zinc finger nucleases, TALENS, and CRISPR, has made the ultimate goal of gene correction a step closer. This review summarizes the challenges faced by gene-based neurotherapeutics and the current and recent strategies designed to overcome these barriers. We have chosen the following challenges to focus on in this review: (1) delivery vehicles (both virus and nonviral), (2) use of promoters for vector-mediated gene expression in CNS, and (3) delivery across the blood-brain barrier. The final section (4) focuses on promising pre-clinical/clinical studies of neurotherapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCentral Nervous System DiseasesGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansViruses

Identifiers

PMID25159276
PMCPMC4391389
OpenAlexW1981877907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.