Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25159097›Full record

ReviewBMC cancer2014

Incidental advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed at the time of radical prostatectomy for prostatic cancer: a case report and review of literature.

Antonio Di Meglio, Pier Vitale Nuzzo, Francesco Ricci, Bruno Spina, Francesco Boccardo

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Di MeglioIRCCS San Martino University Hospital, IST National Cancer Research Institute, Academic Unit of Medical Oncology, Genoa, Italy. antonio.dimeglio@rocketmail.com.
Pier Vitale Nuzzo
Francesco Ricci
Bruno Spina
Francesco Boccardo
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic lymph nodes removed during radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostatic cancer can be found on pathological examination to harbor various unexpected pathologies. Among these, hematologic neoplasms are not infrequent. Given their frequently indolent clinical course, such neoplasms would likely have remained undiagnosed and non-life threatening. Despite this, the case we are reporting describes a rare association between two aggressive neoplasms, and it will be helpful to clinicians who encounter similar combinations of pathologies. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the challenging case of a 56-year-old, caucasian man in whom pathological assessment of pelvic lymph nodes removed during radical retropubic prostatectomy for a high-grade prostatic neoplasm revealed Hodgkin lymphoma, which was subsequently classified as stage IV. There are very few published reports of this combination of pathologies. This situation required a cautious and expert approach to delivering the most appropriate treatment with the most appropriate timing for both diseases.

conclusionThis report describes the multidisciplinary clinical approach we followed at our institution. We have also presented a review of published reports concerning the incidence, histologic type, and management of such concurrent malignancies.

Indexed as

Databases, BibliographicHodgkin DiseaseHumansIncidental FindingsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryProstatectomyProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25159097
PMCPMC4152584
OpenAlexW2147407949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.