Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25158281›Full record

ReviewExperimental cell research2014

A non-sister act: recombination template choice during meiosis.

Neil Humphryes, Andreas Hochwagen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental cell research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Meiotic DNA exchanges inLife science alliance · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Phospho-Regulation of Meiotic Prophase.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Mechanism and Control of Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Break Formation inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil HumphryesDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, USA.
Andreas HochwagenDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, USA. Electronic address: andi@nyu.edu.
New York University · US

Funding

Control of meiotic double strand break formationR01GM088248 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI HOCHWAGEN, ANDREAS · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM088248NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination has two key functions: the faithful assortment of chromosomes into gametes and the creation of genetic diversity. Both processes require that meiotic recombination occurs between homologous chromosomes, rather than sister chromatids. Accordingly, a host of regulatory factors are activated during meiosis to distinguish sisters from homologs, suppress recombination between sister chromatids and promote the chromatids of the homologous chromosome as the preferred recombination partners. Here, we discuss the recent advances in our understanding of the mechanistic basis of meiotic recombination template choice, focusing primarily on developments in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where the regulation is currently best understood.

Indexed as

DNA RepairMeiosisRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSister Chromatid ExchangeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCohesinHomologous RecombinationMeiosisRecombinaseTemplate

Identifiers

PMID25158281
PMCPMC4561180
OpenAlexW1963823727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.