Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25157500›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of psychiatry2015

A randomized trial of collaborative depression care in obstetrics and gynecology clinics: socioeconomic disadvantage and treatment response.

Wayne Katon, Joan Russo, Susan D Reed, Carmen A Croicu, Evette Ludman, Anna LaRocco, Jennifer L Melville

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Can Social Work Interventions Improve Perinatal Mental Health Outcomes? A Systematic Review.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Association between antepartum admission and postpartum depressive symptoms.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Psychiatrist and Psychologist Experiences with Telehealth and Remote Collaborative Care in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wayne KatonFrom the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle; the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle; Northwest Women's Healthcare, Seattle; and Group Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Joan Russo
Susan D Reed
Carmen A Croicu
Evette Ludman
Anna LaRocco
Jennifer L Melville
Harborview Medical Center · US

Funding

Reducing Disparities and Improving Care for Depression in OB-GYN ClinicsR01MH085668 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI UNUTZER, JURGEN · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085668NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH085668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe authors evaluated whether an obstetrics-gynecology clinic-based collaborative depression care intervention is differentially effective compared with usual care for socially disadvantaged women with either no health insurance or with public coverage compared with those with commercial insurance.

methodThe study was a two-site randomized controlled trial with an 18-month follow-up. Women were recruited who screened positive (a score of at least 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and met criteria for major depression or dysthymia. The authors tested whether insurance status had a differential effect on continuous depression outcomes between the intervention and usual care over 18 months. They also assessed differences between the intervention and usual care in quality of depression care and dichotomous clinical outcomes (a decrease of at least 50% in depressive symptom severity and patient-rated improvement on the Patient Global Improvement Scale).

resultsThe treatment effect was significantly associated with insurance status. Compared with patients with commercial insurance, those with no insurance or with public coverage had greater recovery from depression symptoms with collaborative care than with usual care over the 18-month follow-up period. At the 12-month follow-up, the effect size for depression improvement compared with usual care among women with no insurance or with public coverage was 0.81 (95% CI=0.41, 0.95), whereas it was 0.39 (95% CI=-0.08, 0.84) for women with commercial insurance.

conclusionsCollaborative depression care adapted to obstetrics-gynecology settings had a greater impact on depression outcomes for socially disadvantaged women with no insurance or with public coverage compared with women with commercial insurance.

Indexed as

Insurance, HealthPatient Care TeamAdultDysthymic DisorderFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25157500
PMCPMC4301707
OpenAlexW2172081100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.