ReviewFrontiers in plant science2014
New biotechnology enhances the application of cisgenesis in plant breeding.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Edited Maize Expressing Two Native Genes Confers Broad-Spectrum Resistance to Northern Corn Leaf Blight.Molecular plant pathology · 2026Article
- Regulation of gene-edited plants in Europe: from the valley of tears into the shining sun?aBIOTECH · 2024Review
- A CRISPR/Cas9-based vector system enables the fast breeding of selection-marker-free canola with Rcr1-rendered clubroot resistance.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- Cisgenics and intragenics: boon or bane for crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- A CRISPR/Cas9-Based System with Controllable Auto-Excision Feature Serving Cisgenic Plant Breeding and Beyond.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Late blight resistance genes in potato breeding.Planta · 2022Review
- Applications of Genomic Tools in Plant Breeding: Crop Biofortification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Potential of Industrial Hemp for Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Olive (Genes · 2021Review
- Metabolic Engineering Strategies of Industrial Hemp (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Genome Editing Tools in Plants.Genes · 2017Review
- Breeding next generation tree fruits: technical and legal challenges.Horticulture research · 2017Review
- Is it only the regulatory status? Broadening the debate on cisgenic plants.Environmental sciences Europe · 2017Article
- The expanding footprint of CRISPR/Cas9 in the plant sciences.Plant cell reports · 2016Review
- Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina.GM crops & food · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cisgenesis is genetic modification to transfer beneficial alleles from crossable species into a recipient plant. The donor genes transferred by cisgenesis are the same as those used in traditional breeding. It can avoid linkage drag, enhance the use of existing gene alleles. This approach combines traditional breeding techniques with modern biotechnology and dramatically speeds up the breeding process. This allows plant genomes to be modified while remaining plants within the gene pool. Therefore, cisgenic plants should not be assessed as transgenics for environmental impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.