Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25157245›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014

Plant innate immunity against human bacterial pathogens.

Maeli Melotto, Shweta Panchal, Debanjana Roy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Colonization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Citrus CsACD2 Is a Target ofPlant physiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Simple Assay to AssessFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maeli MelottoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, CA, USA.
Shweta PanchalDepartment of Biology, University of Texas Arlington, TX, USA.
Debanjana RoyDepartment of Biology, University of Texas Arlington, TX, USA.

Funding

Stomate-based innate immunity against bacterial infection in ArabidopsisR01AI068718 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHENG YANG, MELOTTO, MAELI · 2008 to 2012
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain human bacterial pathogens such as the enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica are not proven to be plant pathogens yet. Nonetheless, under certain conditions they can survive on, penetrate into, and colonize internal plant tissues causing serious food borne disease outbreaks. In this review, we highlight current understanding on the molecular mechanisms of plant responses against human bacterial pathogens and discuss salient common and contrasting themes of plant interactions with phytopathogens or human pathogens.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli O157:H7fresh produceleafy vegetablesplant defenseSalmonella enterica

Identifiers

PMID25157245
PMCPMC4127659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.