ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014
Cell separation using tilted-angle standing surface acoustic waves.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
146 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micro/Nanostructured Materials and Microfluidic Diagnostic Platforms Enable Multimodal Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Acoustic separation and isolation of viruses, small extracellular vesicles and other nanoscale bioparticles.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Unlocking Microbial Dark Matter: A Comprehensive Review of Isolation Technologies from Traditional Culturing to Single-Cell Technologies.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Surface Acoustic Wave Devices: New Mechanisms, Enabling Techniques, and Application Frontiers.Micromachines · 2026Review
- A Novel Microfluidic Platform for Circulating Tumor Cell Identification in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Micromachines · 2025Article
- B cell mechanobiology in health and disease: emerging techniques and insights into therapeutic responses.FEBS letters · 2025Review
- Integrated microfluidic platforms for extracellular vesicles: Separation, detection, and clinical translation.APL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Disposable Microchip Platform with Removable Actuators Using SAW Excitation.ACS measurement science au · 2025Article
- Review
- Centrifuge-free cell radiolabeling using acoustophoresis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Slanted-Finger Interdigitated Transducer Microfluidic Device for Particles Sorting.Micromachines · 2025Article
- A Review of SAW-Based Micro- and Nanoparticle Manipulation in Microfluidics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- High-Performance and Environmentally-Friendly Bulk-Wave-Acoustofluidic Devices Driven by Lead-Free Piezoelectric Materials.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Microfluidic Technology for Measuring Mechanical Properties of Single Cells and Its Application.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- EchoTilt: An Acoustofluidic Method for the Capture and Enrichment of Nanoplastics Directed Toward Drinking Water Monitoring.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Numerical study on a facing electrode configuration dielectrophoresis microfluidic system for efficient biological cell separation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Joint subarray acoustic tweezers enable controllable cell translation, rotation, and deformation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Acousto-dielectric tweezers enable independent manipulation of multiple particles.Science advances · 2024Article
- Capillary wave tweezer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Separation of cells is a critical process for studying cell properties, disease diagnostics, and therapeutics. Cell sorting by acoustic waves offers a means to separate cells on the basis of their size and physical properties in a label-free, contactless, and biocompatible manner. The separation sensitivity and efficiency of currently available acoustic-based approaches, however, are limited, thereby restricting their widespread application in research and health diagnostics. In this work, we introduce a unique configuration of tilted-angle standing surface acoustic waves (taSSAW), which are oriented at an optimally designed inclination to the flow direction in the microfluidic channel. We demonstrate that this design significantly improves the efficiency and sensitivity of acoustic separation techniques. To optimize our device design, we carried out systematic simulations of cell trajectories, matching closely with experimental results. Using numerically optimized design of taSSAW, we successfully separated 2- and 10-µm-diameter polystyrene beads with a separation efficiency of ∼ 99%, and separated 7.3- and 9.9-µm-polystyrene beads with an efficiency of ∼ 97%. We illustrate that taSSAW is capable of effectively separating particles-cells of approximately the same size and density but different compressibility. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the present technique for biological-biomedical applications by sorting MCF-7 human breast cancer cells from nonmalignant leukocytes, while preserving the integrity of the separated cells. The method introduced here thus offers a unique route for separating circulating tumor cells, and for label-free cell separation with potential applications in biological research, disease diagnostics, and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.