Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25156897›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2014

How discordant morphological and molecular evolution among microorganisms can revise our notions of biodiversity on Earth.

Daniel J G Lahr, Haywood Dail Laughinghouse, Angela M Oliverio, Feng Gao, Laura A Katz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microbial Evolution and Systematics: Archaea and Bacteria.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Motile curved bacteria are Pareto-optimal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. On the evolution of bacterial multicellularity.Current opinion in microbiology · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel J G LahrDepartment of Zoology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Haywood Dail Laughinghouse
Angela M Oliverio
Feng Gao
Laura A Katz

Funding

Evolution of germline and somatic genomes in the ciliate Chilodonella uncinataR15GM097722 · NIGMS · SMITH COLLEGE · PI KATZ, LAURA ALINE · 2011 to 2011
$265k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R15GM097722-01NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM097722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopy has revealed tremendous diversity of bacterial and eukaryotic forms. Recent molecular analyses show discordance in estimates of biodiversity between morphological and molecular analyses. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses of the diversity of microbial forms reveal evidence of convergence at scales as deep as interdomain: morphologies shared between bacteria and eukaryotes. Here, we highlight examples of such discordance, focusing on exemplary lineages such as testate amoebae, ciliates, and cyanobacteria. These have long histories of morphological study, enabling deeper analyses on both the molecular and morphological sides. We discuss examples in two main categories: (i) morphologically identical (or highly similar) individuals that are genetically distinct and (ii) morphologically distinct individuals that are genetically the same. We argue that hypotheses about discordance can be tested using the concept of neutral morphologies, or more broadly neutral phenotypes, as a null hypothesis.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEarth, PlanetEvolution, MolecularBacteriaHumansPhylogenymicrobial evolutionmolecular datamorphologyneutral evolution

Identifiers

PMID25156897
PMCPMC4288574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.