ArticleJAMA internal medicine2014
Patient selection for diagnostic coronary angiography and hospital-level percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Patient Demographics and Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Article
- Choroidal thickness as predictor of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in adults with type 1 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dexmedetomidine's Effect on Catecholamine and Inflammation in Reducing In-Hospital Adverse Events for Older Patients with STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- An elevated triglyceride-glucose index predicts adverse outcomes and interacts with the treatment strategy in patients with three-vessel disease.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023Article
- Guideline adherence in the use of coronary angiography in patients presenting at the emergency department without myocardial infarction - Results from the German ENLIGHT-KHK project.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the guideline-adherence of coronary angiography in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome - Results from the German prospective multicentre ENLIGHT-KHK project.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
- Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Challenges and Burdens in the Coronary Artery Disease Care Pathway for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Three-Vessel Coronary Disease After Revascularization: Results from a Large Cohort of 3561 Patients.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Article
- Gender-Based Long-Term Outcomes After Revascularization for Three-Vessel Coronary Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.Clinical interventions in aging · 2022Article
- Real-world long-term outcomes based on three therapeutic strategies in very old patients with three-vessel disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Observational
- miR-30b-5p Downregulation as a Predictive Biomarker of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Prediabetes and long-term outcomes in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease: A large single-center cohort study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2021Observational
- Appropriate use criteria for coronary angiography: a single centre experience.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2020Article
- Cardiac-CT and cardiac-MR cost-effectiveness: a literature review.La Radiologia medica · 2020Review
- Impact of cardiovascular risk stratification strategies in kidney transplantation over time.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020Article
- Coronary Disease Surveillance in the Community: Angiography and Revascularization.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Relationship Between Appropriateness and Outcomes: It Is Complicated.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceDiagnostic coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients may lead to inappropriate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to a diagnostic-therapeutic cascade. Understanding the association between patient selection for coronary angiography and PCI appropriateness may inform strategies to minimize inappropriate procedures.
objectiveTo determine if hospitals that frequently perform coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients, a clinical scenario in which the benefit of angiography is less clear, are more likely to perform inappropriate PCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsMulticenter observational study of 544 hospitals participating in the CathPCI Registry between July 1, 2009, and September 30, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital proportion of asymptomatic patients at diagnostic coronary angiography and hospital rate of inappropriate PCI as defined by 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization.
resultsOf 1 225 562 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography, 308 083 (25.1%) were asymptomatic. The hospital proportion of angiography among asymptomatic patients ranged from 1.0% to 73.6% (median, 24.7%; interquartile range, 15.9%-35.9%). By hospital quartile of asymptomatic patients at angiography, hospitals with higher rates of asymptomatic patients at angiography had higher median rates of inappropriate PCI (14.8% vs 20.2% vs 24.0 vs 29.4% from lowest to highest quartile, P < .001 for trend). This outcome was attributable to more frequent use of inappropriate PCI in asymptomatic patients at hospitals with higher rates of angiography in asymptomatic patients (5.4% vs 9.9% vs 14.7% vs 21.6% from lowest to highest quartile, P < .001 for trend). Hospitals with higher rates of asymptomatic patients at angiography also had lower rates of appropriate PCI (38.7% vs 33.0% vs 32.3% vs 32.9% from lowest to highest quartile, P < .001 for trend). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a national sample of hospitals, performance of coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients was associated with higher rates of inappropriate PCI and lower rates of appropriate PCI. Improving preprocedural risk stratification and thresholds for coronary angiography may be one strategy to improve the appropriateness of PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.