Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25156729›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2014

Dose response of Listeria monocytogenes invasion, fetal morbidity, and fetal mortality after oral challenge in pregnant and nonpregnant Mongolian gerbils.

Rebecca M Roulo, Jillian D Fishburn, Mayowa Amosu, Ashley R Etchison, Mary Alice Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Development of Dose-Response Models for the Ingestion Exposure Route and Stillbirth Outcome for Listeria monocytogenes.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Maternal sepsis caused byBMJ case reports · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Unraveling the dose-response puzzle ofInfectious Disease Modelling · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca M RouloDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Jillian D FishburnDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Mayowa AmosuDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Ashley R EtchisonDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Mary Alice SmithDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia, USA masmith@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

PHS HHS 10223SOL00303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a food-borne pathogen that can result in adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as stillbirth or premature delivery. The Mongolian gerbil was recently proposed as the most appropriate small-animal model of listeriosis due to its susceptibility to the same invasion pathways as humans. The objectives of this study were to investigate invasion and adverse pregnancy outcomes in gerbils orally exposed to L. monocytogenes, to compare the dose-response data to those of other animal models, and to investigate differences in the responses of pregnant versus nonpregnant gerbils. Gerbils were orally exposed to 0 (control), 10(3), 10(5), 10(7), or 10(9) CFU L. monocytogenes in whipping cream. L. monocytogenes was recovered in a dose-dependent manner from fecal samples, adult organs, and pregnancy-associated tissues. Dams exposed to 10(9) CFU had more invaded organs and higher concentrations of L. monocytogenes in almost all organs than nonpregnant animals, though no differences in fecal shedding were seen between the two groups. Adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred only in the dams treated with 10(9) CFU. A 50% infectivity dose (ID50) of 2.60 × 10(6) CFU for fetuses was calculated by fitting the data to a logistic model. Our results suggest that the 50% lethal dose (LD50) falls within the range of 5 × 10(6) to 5 × 10(8) CFU. This range includes the guinea pig and nonhuman primate LD50s, but the observation that L. monocytogenes-induced stillbirths can be seen in guinea pigs and primates exposed to lower doses than those at which stillbirths were seen in gerbils indicates that gerbils are not more sensitive to L. monocytogenes invasion.

Indexed as

Listeria monocytogenesAnimalsFecesFemaleFetusGerbillinaeListeriosisPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID25156729
PMCPMC4249347
OpenAlexW2146323410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.