Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25156576›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2015

Robust brain parcellation using sparse representation on resting-state fMRI.

Yu Zhang, Svenja Caspers, Lingzhong Fan, Yong Fan, Ming Song, Cirong Liu, Yin Mo, Christian Roski, Simon Eickhoff, Katrin Amunts and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu ZhangBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Svenja CaspersInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.
Lingzhong FanBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Yong FanBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Ming SongBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Cirong LiuQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Yin MoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, People's Republic of China.
Christian RoskiInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.
Simon EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.
Katrin AmuntsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.
Tianzi JiangBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China. jiangtz@nlpr.ia.ac.cn.

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH074457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) has been widely used to segregate the brain into individual modules based on the presence of distinct connectivity patterns. Many parcellation methods have been proposed for brain parcellation using rs-fMRI, but their results have been somewhat inconsistent, potentially due to various types of noise. In this study, we provide a robust parcellation method for rs-fMRI-based brain parcellation, which constructs a sparse similarity graph based on the sparse representation coefficients of each seed voxel and then uses spectral clustering to identify distinct modules. Both the local time-varying BOLD signals and whole-brain connectivity patterns may be used as features and yield similar parcellation results. The robustness of our method was tested on both simulated and real rs-fMRI datasets. In particular, on simulated rs-fMRI data, sparse representation achieved good performance across different noise levels, including high accuracy of parcellation and high robustness to noise. On real rs-fMRI data, stable parcellation of the medial frontal cortex (MFC) and parietal operculum (OP) were achieved on three different datasets, with high reproducibility within each dataset and high consistency across these results. Besides, the parcellation of MFC was little influenced by the degrees of spatial smoothing. Furthermore, the consistent parcellation of OP was also well corresponding to cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and known somatotopic organizations. Our results demonstrate a new promising approach to robust brain parcellation using resting-state fMRI by sparse representation.

Indexed as

AdultArtifactsBrainBrain MappingCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of ResultsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultFunctional connectivityMedial frontal cortexParietal operculumResting stateRobust brain parcellationSparse representation

Identifiers

PMID25156576
PMCPMC4575697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.