Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25156506›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2014

Wolbachia do not live by reproductive manipulation alone: infection polymorphism in Drosophila suzukii and D. subpulchrella.

Christopher A Hamm, David J Begun, Alexandre Vo, Chris C R Smith, Perot Saelao, Amanda O Shaver, John Jaenike, Michael Turelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pervasive effects ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Climate predictsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. HowBiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Male-dependent resistance toRoyal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Updates on traditional methods for combating malaria and emergingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Dynamic changes inEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher A HammDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
David J Begun
Alexandre Vo
Chris C R Smith
Perot Saelao
Amanda O Shaver
John Jaenike
Michael Turelli

Funding

Evolution of interactions between Wolbachia and its hosts: Drosophila model systeR01GM104325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TURELLI, MICHAEL · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
Genomic analysis of adaptation in DrosophilaR01GM084056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BEGUN, DAVID J · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084056NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM084056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila suzukii recently invaded North America and Europe. Populations in Hawaii, California, New York and Nova Scotia are polymorphic for Wolbachia, typically with <20% infection frequency. The Wolbachia in D. suzukii, denoted wSuz, is closely related to wRi, the variant prevalent in continental populations of D. simulans. wSuz is also nearly identical to Wolbachia found in D. subpulchrella, plausibly D. suzukii's sister species. This suggests vertical Wolbachia transmission through cladogenesis ('cladogenic transmission'). The widespread occurrence of 7-20% infection frequencies indicates a stable polymorphism. wSuz is imperfectly maternally transmitted, with wild infected females producing on average 5-10% uninfected progeny. As expected from its low frequency, wSuz produces no cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), that is, no increased embryo mortality when infected males mate with uninfected females, and no appreciable sex-ratio distortion. The persistence of wSuz despite imperfect maternal transmission suggests positive fitness effects. Assuming a balance between selection and imperfect transmission, we expect a fitness advantage on the order of 20%. Unexpectedly, Wolbachia-infected females produce fewer progeny than do uninfected females. We do not yet understand the maintenance of wSuz in D. suzukii. The absence of detectable CI in D. suzukii and D. subpulchrella makes it unlikely that CI-based mechanisms could be used to control this species without transinfection using novel Wolbachia. Contrary to their reputation as horizontally transmitted reproductive parasites, many Wolbachia infections are acquired through introgression or cladogenesis and many cause no appreciable reproductive manipulation. Such infections, likely to be mutualistic, may be central to understanding the pervasiveness of Wolbachia among arthropods.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, MitochondrialDrosophilaFemaleFertilityMaleMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyReproductionWolbachiaDNA, Mitochondrialendosymbiontfecunditymutualismreproductive manipulationtransmission

Identifiers

PMID25156506
PMCPMC4180775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.