Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25156180›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2015

Trends in socio-economic inequalities in mortality by sex in Ireland from the 1980s to the 2000s.

R Layte, J Banks, C Walsh, G McKnight

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R LayteDepartment of Sociology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, richard.layte@esri.ie.
J Banks
C Walsh
G McKnight

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been recognised for some time that mortality rates vary across social class groups, with lower rates in the higher social classes. Internationally, but particularly in Ireland, many studies on the topic of inequalities in mortality have been confined to men, partly because the most frequently used socioeconomic classification, that based on occupation, can less easily be applied to women. Where research does exist, studies indicate that health inequalities are greater for men than for women. Given the issues around classification, there remains however, little knowledge of the socio-economic inequalities in female mortality in Ireland.

aimsUsing annual mortality data from the Irish Central Statistics Office over the period 1984-2008 this paper calculates crude and standardised mortality rates per 100,000 population for men and women in different socio-economic groups (SEG) and examines trends in these over time. This means that for the first time, longitudinal comparisons can be made between men and women across an important period of recent Irish history.

resultsThere is a significant gradient in mortality rates across SEG for both men and women with the absolute and relative differential between professional and manual occupational groups increasing between the 1980s and 2000s even though the mortality rates were falling over time for all SEG groups for both sexes.

conclusionsThe results confirm international findings that women generally have smaller gradients than men across SEG with the ratio of male/female differentials (i.e. the ratio of the male SEG rate ratio to the female SEG rate ratio) decreasing between the 1980s and 2000s from 1.25 to 1.07.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedMortalityOccupationsSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.