ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
Content-based histopathology image retrieval using CometCloud.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Web engine for tumor pathology image retrievals on massive scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Applications of discriminative and deep learning feature extraction methods for whole slide image analysis: A survey.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Review
- Fast and scalable search of whole-slide images via self-supervised deep learning.Nature biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- An Expandable Informatics Framework for Enhancing Central Cancer Registries with Digital Pathology Specimens, Computational Imaging Tools, and Advanced Mining Capabilities.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
- Machine learning approaches for pathologic diagnosis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019Review
- High throughput automatic muscle image segmentation using parallel framework.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Similar image search for histopathology: SMILY.NPJ digital medicine · 2019Article
- Deep Learning-Based Retrieval System for Gigapixel Histopathology Cases and the Open Access Literature.Journal of pathology informatics · 2019Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2018Review
- An Assessment of Imaging Informatics for Precision Medicine in Cancer.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
- Parallel Versus Distributed Data Access for Gigapixel-Resolution Histology Images: Challenges and Opportunities.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2017Article
- Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities.Medical image analysis · 2016Review
- Scalable analysis of Big pathology image data cohorts using efficient methods and high-performance computing strategies.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe development of digital imaging technology is creating extraordinary levels of accuracy that provide support for improved reliability in different aspects of the image analysis, such as content-based image retrieval, image segmentation, and classification. This has dramatically increased the volume and rate at which data are generated. Together these facts make querying and sharing non-trivial and render centralized solutions unfeasible. Moreover, in many cases this data is often distributed and must be shared across multiple institutions requiring decentralized solutions. In this context, a new generation of data/information driven applications must be developed to take advantage of the national advanced cyber-infrastructure (ACI) which enable investigators to seamlessly and securely interact with information/data which is distributed across geographically disparate resources. This paper presents the development and evaluation of a novel content-based image retrieval (CBIR) framework. The methods were tested extensively using both peripheral blood smears and renal glomeruli specimens. The datasets and performance were evaluated by two pathologists to determine the concordance.
resultsThe CBIR algorithms that were developed can reliably retrieve the candidate image patches exhibiting intensity and morphological characteristics that are most similar to a given query image. The methods described in this paper are able to reliably discriminate among subtle staining differences and spatial pattern distributions. By integrating a newly developed dual-similarity relevance feedback module into the CBIR framework, the CBIR results were improved substantially. By aggregating the computational power of high performance computing (HPC) and cloud resources, we demonstrated that the method can be successfully executed in minutes on the Cloud compared to weeks using standard computers.
conclusionsIn this paper, we present a set of newly developed CBIR algorithms and validate them using two different pathology applications, which are regularly evaluated in the practice of pathology. Comparative experimental results demonstrate excellent performance throughout the course of a set of systematic studies. Additionally, we present and evaluate a framework to enable the execution of these algorithms across distributed resources. We show how parallel searching of content-wise similar images in the dataset significantly reduces the overall computational time to ensure the practical utility of the proposed CBIR algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.