Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25155691›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014

Content-based histopathology image retrieval using CometCloud.

Xin Qi, Daihou Wang, Ivan Rodero, Javier Diaz-Montes, Rebekah H Gensure, Fuyong Xing, Hua Zhong, Lauri Goodell, Manish Parashar, David J Foran and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Web engine for tumor pathology image retrievals on massive scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Machine learning approaches for pathologic diagnosis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xin QiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rutger Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ, USA. qixi@rutgers.edu.
Daihou Wang
Ivan Rodero
Javier Diaz-Montes
Rebekah H Gensure
Fuyong Xing
Hua Zhong
Lauri Goodell
Manish Parashar
David J Foran
Lin Yang

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI EDMUND C. LATTIME · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
Image Mining for Comparative Analysis of Expression Patterns in Tissue MicroarrayR01LM009239 · NLM · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI FORAN, DAVID J, SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2007 to 2016
$4.5M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR000116 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
Informatics for Integrative Brain Tumor Whole Slide AnalysisR01LM011119 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FORAN, DAVID J, SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
Development and Dissemination of MuscleMiner: An Imaging Informatics Tool for MusR01AR065479 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DING, MINGZHOU · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Collaborative Systems for Analyzing Tissue MicroarraysR01CA156386 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI FORAN, DAVID J · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Mechano-Visual Phenotyping of Cancer: From Onset Through Disease ProgressionR01CA161375 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI DESAI, JAYDEV P., FORAN, DAVID J · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceTL1TR000115 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$518k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000116NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000115NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000117NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA156386-09NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA161375-03NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS R01 CA156386NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161375NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065479NLM NIH HHS 2R01LM009239-05NLM NIH HHS 5R01LM011119-03NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009239NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of digital imaging technology is creating extraordinary levels of accuracy that provide support for improved reliability in different aspects of the image analysis, such as content-based image retrieval, image segmentation, and classification. This has dramatically increased the volume and rate at which data are generated. Together these facts make querying and sharing non-trivial and render centralized solutions unfeasible. Moreover, in many cases this data is often distributed and must be shared across multiple institutions requiring decentralized solutions. In this context, a new generation of data/information driven applications must be developed to take advantage of the national advanced cyber-infrastructure (ACI) which enable investigators to seamlessly and securely interact with information/data which is distributed across geographically disparate resources. This paper presents the development and evaluation of a novel content-based image retrieval (CBIR) framework. The methods were tested extensively using both peripheral blood smears and renal glomeruli specimens. The datasets and performance were evaluated by two pathologists to determine the concordance.

resultsThe CBIR algorithms that were developed can reliably retrieve the candidate image patches exhibiting intensity and morphological characteristics that are most similar to a given query image. The methods described in this paper are able to reliably discriminate among subtle staining differences and spatial pattern distributions. By integrating a newly developed dual-similarity relevance feedback module into the CBIR framework, the CBIR results were improved substantially. By aggregating the computational power of high performance computing (HPC) and cloud resources, we demonstrated that the method can be successfully executed in minutes on the Cloud compared to weeks using standard computers.

conclusionsIn this paper, we present a set of newly developed CBIR algorithms and validate them using two different pathology applications, which are regularly evaluated in the practice of pathology. Comparative experimental results demonstrate excellent performance throughout the course of a set of systematic studies. Additionally, we present and evaluate a framework to enable the execution of these algorithms across distributed resources. We show how parallel searching of content-wise similar images in the dataset significantly reduces the overall computational time to ensure the practical utility of the proposed CBIR algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnostic ImagingPathologyFeedbackInformation Storage and RetrievalPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25155691
PMCPMC4161917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.