Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25155610›Full record

ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2014

Hydrogels and scaffolds for immunomodulation.

Ankur Singh, Nicholas A Peppas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Chemokine/cytokine-releasing biomaterials induce in situ tertiary lymphoid-like structures and enhance antitumor immunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Innovative Hydrogel Design: Tailoring Immunomodulation for Optimal Chronic Wound Recovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Granular Hydrogels for Harnessing the Immune Response.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024
    Review
  17. Biomaterial-Based In Situ Cancer Vaccines.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ankur SinghSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Nicholas A Peppas

Funding

Development of A Prepolarized MRI Extremity ScannerR01EB000346 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACOVSKI, ALBERT · 2002 to 2004
$1.1M
(PQD5)Biomaterials-based Adaptive Tumor Microenvironments for In Vitro Drug ScreeR21CA185236 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CERCHIETTI, LEANDRO C, SINGH, ANKUR · 2014 to 2015
$395k
NCI NIH HHS 1R21 CA185236-01NCI NIH HHS R21 CA185236NIBIB NIH HHS EB 1R01-000346-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over two decades, immunologists and biomaterials scientists have co-existed in parallel world with the rationale of understanding the molecular profile of immune responses to vaccination, implantation, and treating incurable diseases. Much of the field of biomaterial-based immunotherapy has relied on evaluating model antigens such as chicken egg ovalbumin in mouse models but their relevance to humans has been point of much discussion. Nevertheless, such model antigens have provided important insights into the mechanisms of immune regulation and served as a proof-of-concept for plethora of biomaterial-based vaccines. After years of extensive development of numerous biomaterials for immunomodulation, it is only recently that an experimental scaffold vaccine implanted beneath the skin has begun to use the human model to study the immune responses to cancer vaccination by co-delivering patient-derived tumor lysates and immunomodulatory proteins. If successful, this scaffold vaccine will change the way we approached untreatable cancers, but more importantly, will allow a faster and more rational translation of therapeutic regimes to other cancers, chronic infections, and autoimmune diseases. Most materials reviews have focused on immunomodulatory adjuvants and micro-nano-particles. Here we provide an insight into emerging hydrogel and scaffold based immunomodulatory approaches that continue to demonstrate efficacy against immune associated diseases.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCellular MicroenvironmentDendritic CellsHumansHydrogelsImmunomodulationVaccinesHydrogelsVaccinesbiomaterialshydrogelsimmunologyimmunomodulationpolymersscaffolds

Identifiers

PMID25155610
PMCPMC4269549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.