Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25155505›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2014

Interneuronal mechanism for Tinbergen's hierarchical model of behavioral choice.

Zsolt Pirger, Michael Crossley, Zita László, Souvik Naskar, György Kemenes, Michael O'Shea, Paul R Benjamin, Ildikó Kemenes

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Functional mapping of the molluscan brain guided by synchrotron X-ray tomography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zsolt PirgerSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
Michael CrossleySussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
Zita LászlóSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
Souvik NaskarSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
György KemenesSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
Michael O'SheaSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
Paul R BenjaminSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
Ildikó KemenesSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK. Electronic address: i.kemenes@sussex.ac.uk.
University of Sussex · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009906/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of behavioral choice support the notion that the decision to carry out one behavior rather than another depends on the reconfiguration of shared interneuronal networks [1]. We investigated another decision-making strategy, derived from the classical ethological literature [2, 3], which proposes that behavioral choice depends on competition between autonomous networks. According to this model, behavioral choice depends on inhibitory interactions between incompatible hierarchically organized behaviors. We provide evidence for this by investigating the interneuronal mechanisms mediating behavioral choice between two autonomous circuits that underlie whole-body withdrawal [4, 5] and feeding [6] in the pond snail Lymnaea. Whole-body withdrawal is a defensive reflex that is initiated by tactile contact with predators. As predicted by the hierarchical model, tactile stimuli that evoke whole-body withdrawal responses also inhibit ongoing feeding in the presence of feeding stimuli. By recording neurons from the feeding and withdrawal networks, we found no direct synaptic connections between the interneuronal and motoneuronal elements that generate the two behaviors. Instead, we discovered that behavioral choice depends on the interaction between two unique types of interneurons with asymmetrical synaptic connectivity that allows withdrawal to override feeding. One type of interneuron, the Pleuro-Buccal (PlB), is an extrinsic modulatory neuron of the feeding network that completely inhibits feeding when excited by touch-induced monosynaptic input from the second type of interneuron, Pedal-Dorsal12 (PeD12). PeD12 plays a critical role in behavioral choice by providing a synaptic pathway joining the two behavioral networks that underlies the competitive dominance of whole-body withdrawal over feeding.

Indexed as

Synaptic TransmissionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorFeeding BehaviorInterneuronsLymnaea

Identifiers

PMID25155505
PMCPMC4159561
OpenAlexW2051441571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.