Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25155050›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015

Combined anterior and rotational laxity measurements allow characterizing personal knee laxity profiles in healthy individuals.

Caroline Mouton, Romain Seil, Tim Meyer, Hélène Agostinis, Daniel Theisen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A scoping review and guide for in vitro healthy human knee joint laxity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Validating subject-specific knee models fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2016
    Review
  11. Combined anterior and rotational knee laxity measurements improve the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline MoutonSport Medicine Research Laboratory, Public Research Center for Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Romain SeilSport Medicine Research Laboratory, Public Research Center for Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Tim MeyerInstitute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, Saarland University, Saarbrūcken, Germany.
Hélène AgostinisSport Medicine Research Laboratory, Public Research Center for Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Daniel TheisenSport Medicine Research Laboratory, Public Research Center for Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. daniel.theisen@crp-sante.lu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to quantify sagittal and rotational knee laxity profiles taking into account individual influencing factors.

methodsLinear regression models were used to determine which individual characteristics (age, height, body mass and sex) influenced the outcome in a group of 104 healthy subjects. The standardized residuals were used as individualized (corrected) laxity scores and were combined to determine knee laxity profiles.

resultsAnterior knee laxity was not influenced by individual characteristics. Rotational knee laxity was higher in females and inversely related to body mass. The correlation between anterior laxity and internal rotation scores was weak (r = 0.24, p = 0.02). The proportion of knees concerned by increased laxity scores (scores >1) was similar for anterior displacement, internal and external rotation (15 %). Only 32 % of the tested subjects showed a normal profile (score >-1 and <1) for all three directions, 33 % were concerned by hyperlaxity, 40 % by hypolaxity and 5 % by both.

conclusionsThe diversity of laxity profiles found here highlights that the interpretation of multidirectional knee laxity is complex and suggests the necessity for individualized care of knee diseases and injuries. These results contribute to the understanding of knee laxity and throw the basis for prevention strategies and improvement of treatment outcomes in injuries and diseases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series with no comparison groups, Level IV.

Indexed as

AdultArthrometry, ArticularFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularReference ValuesRotationYoung AdultAnterior knee laxityKnee laxity profilesRotational knee laxity

Identifiers

PMID25155050
PMCPMC4661198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.