ReviewDer Orthopade2014
[Patellofemoral arthroplasty: indication, technique and results].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Patellofemoral arthroplasty].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2017Trial
- Treatment of Unicompartmental Cartilage Defects of the Knee with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Patellofemoral Partial Knee Arthroplasty or Focal Resurfacing.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- [Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]Der Orthopade · 2021Review
- The clinical outcome of the different HemiCAP and UniCAP knee implants: A systematic and comprehensive review.Orthopedic reviews · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough patellofemoral arthroplasty has been used for more than 30 years, it is still a challenging subject in orthopedics. The reason for this are the complex kinematics of the patellofemoral joint which are influenced by dynamic and static factors. New implant concepts that incorporate multiple coronal and sagittal curvatures and surface controlled inlay implantation show a positive direction in modern patellofemoral arthroplasty.
objectivesThe purpose of this work is the review of the literature on patellofemoral arthroplasty and the presentation of our own experience.
methodsWe present indications and surgical techniques of patellofemoral arthroplasty as well as the most important aspects of preoperative evaluation. The patellofemoral joint can be reconstructed using either an inlay or an onlay prosthesis. Both arthroplasty concepts are discussed. Additional pathologies like chronic patellofemoral instabilities due to dysplasia, valgus/varus or rotational malalignment, and soft-tissue alterations are addressed with concomitant procedures.
resultsBoth inlay and onlay arthroplasty have demonstrated good functional outcome scores in patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Patients with patellofemoral instability and/or trochlear dysplasia may benefit more from patellofemoral arthroplasty than patients with primary osteoarthritis because not only pain but also secondary pathologies are addressed.
conclusionPatellofemoral arthroplasty is an effective and safe procedure if the indication criteria are respected and the specific surgical technique is used. However, comparative results on current inlay and onlay prostheses have not been published in the literature to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.