ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014
Investigation of DNA repair gene variants on myelodysplastic syndromes in a Turkish population.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional polymorphisms of DNA repair genes in Latin America reinforces the heterogeneity of Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the possible influence of genetic polymorphisms in hOGG1, XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, XPG and APE1 on the observed DNA damage in a group of Turkish myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. A total of 39 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and 78 age-matched healthy control subjects were included in our study. Polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was performed for the detection of DNA repair gene variants. No significant differences in DNA repair enzymes APE1, XRCC1 and XPG were found between MDS patients and controls. On the other hand, XRCC3, XPD and hOGG1 were associated with an increased risk of MDS (p=0.004, p=0.000, p=0.017, respectively). Specifically, Thr/Met genotype was more relevant in patients (p=0.026) in XRCC3; in hOGG1, Cys+ genotype was found higher in patients (p=0.017); and in XPD, Gln/Gln genotypes were found higher in the patient (p=0.001). In conclusion, XRCC3, XPD and hOGG1 genotypes are associated with an increased MDS risk, suggesting their possible involvement in the pathogenesis and biology of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.