Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25154706›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Effects of inflammation on hippocampus and substantia nigra responses to novelty in healthy human participants.

Neil A Harrison, Mara Cercignani, Valerie Voon, Hugo D Critchley

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neil A Harrison1] Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex Campus, Brighton, UK [2] Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Mara CercignaniClinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex Campus, Brighton, UK.
Valerie VoonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hugo D Critchley1] Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex Campus, Brighton, UK [2] Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Wellcome Trust 093705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are naturally inquisitive. This tendency is adaptive, aiding identification of potentially valuable novel outcomes. The dopaminergic substantia nigra (SN) is implicated in the drive to explore novel stimuli and situations. However, infection and inflammation inhibit the motivation to seek out novelty. This likely serves to limit exposure to uncertain, potentially detrimental outcomes when metabolic resources are limited. Nevertheless, the neural mechanisms through which inflammation constrains novelty seeking are poorly understood. We therefore scanned 16 healthy participants (6 male, mean 27.2±7.3 years), using fMRI, once following experimental inflammation (intramuscular (i.m.) typhoid vaccination) and once after placebo (i.m. saline), with the aim of characterizing effects of inflammation on neural processing of novel and familiar place, and face stimuli. We specifically tested the effects of inflammation on the hypothesized roles of SN and hippocampus in novelty processing. Typhoid vaccination evoked a nearly threefold increase in circulating pro-inflammatory cytokine (interleukin-6) levels 3 h after injection, indicating induction of mild systemic inflammation. Enhanced hippocampal responses to novel (compared with familiar) stimuli were observed following both vaccine and placebo, consistent with intact central novelty detection. However, the normal bilateral reactivity of SN to stimulus novelty was significantly attenuated following inflammation. Correspondingly, inflammation also markedly impaired novelty-related functional coupling between the SN and hippocampus. These data extend previous findings of SN sensitivity to mild inflammation associated with changes in psychomotor responding, and suggest that inflammation-induced blunting of SN responses to hippocampal novelty signals may represent a plausible mechanism through which inflammation impairs motivational responses to novelty.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCross-Over StudiesCytokinesDouble-Blind MethodExploratory BehaviorFemaleHealthy VolunteersHippocampusHumansInflammationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenPhotic StimulationPolysaccharides, BacterialCytokinesOxygenPolysaccharides, BacterialTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesVi polysaccharide vaccine, typhoid

Identifiers

PMID25154706
PMCPMC4264953
OpenAlexW1968984586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.