Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25154628›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2014

Does dietary folic acid supplementation in mouse NTD models affect neural tube development or gamete preference at fertilization?

Ghunwa A Nakouzi, Joseph H Nadeau

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Parent-of-origin effects of A1CF and AGO2 on testicular germ-cell tumors, testicular abnormalities, and fertilization bias.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ghunwa A Nakouzi
Joseph H NadeauDepartment of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. jnadeau@pnri.org.
University School · US

Funding

Genetic Predisposition & Prevention of Neural Tube Defects (NTDs)R01NS058979 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI NADEAU, JOSEPH H., NISWANDER, LEE A. · 2009 to 2010
$2.4M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP1HD075624NINDS NIH HHS NS058979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeural tube defects (NTDs) are the second most common birth defect in humans. Dietary folic acid (FA) supplementation effectively and safely reduces the incidence of these often debilitating congenital anomalies. FA plays an established role in folate and homocysteine metabolism, but the means by which it suppresses occurrence of NTDs is not understood. In addition, many cases remain resistant to the beneficial effects of folic acid supplementation. To better understand the molecular, biochemical and developmental mechanisms by which FA exerts its effect on NTDs, characterized mouse models are needed that have a defined genetic basis and known response to dietary supplementation.

resultsWe examined the effect of FA supplementation, at 5-fold the level in the control diet, on the NTD and vertebral phenotypes in Apobtm1Unc and Vangl2Lp mice, hereafter referred to as Apob and Lp respectively. The FA supplemented diet did not reduce the incidence or severity of NTDs in Apob or Lp mutant homozygotes or the loop-tail phenotype in Lp mutant heterozygotes, suggesting that mice with these mutant alleles are resistant to FA supplementation. Folic acid supplementation also did not affect the rate of resorptions or the size of litters, but instead skewed the embryonic genotype distribution in favor of wild-type alleles.

conclusionSimilar genotypic biases have been reported for several NTD models, but were interpreted as diet-induced increases in the incidence and severity of NTDs that led to increased embryonic lethality. Absence of differences in resorption rates and litter sizes argue against induced embryonic lethality. We suggest an alternative interpretation, namely that FA supplementation led to strongly skewed allelic inheritance, perhaps from disturbances in polyamine metabolism that biases fertilization in favor of wild-type gametes.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsApolipoprotein B-100Apolipoproteins BDietDisease Models, AnimalEmbryo LossFemaleFertilizationFolic AcidGerm CellsInheritance PatternsMaleMiceMutationNerve Tissue ProteinsApob protein, mouseApolipoprotein B-100Apolipoproteins BFolic AcidLtap protein, mouseNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25154628
PMCPMC4151023
OpenAlexW2020283296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.