ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2014
[Organ-preserving therapy for penile carcinoma].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Reconstructive surgery in penile cancer].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018Review
- [Urethral centralization and pseudo-glans formation after partial penectomy].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, a definite change towards organ-sparing, reconstructive local treatment of penile cancer has been observed. Surgical treatment aims to achieve margin-free resections with risk-adapted much smaller safety margins. Thus, the penile structures are preserved as far as possible or reconstructed in order to achieve a functionally and cosmetically satisfactory result. The oncological safety concerning tumor-free survival is not compromised. However, a higher rate of local recurrences has to be accepted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.