Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25154010›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychopharmacology2014

Methamphetamine self-administration in humans during D-amphetamine maintenance.

Erika Pike, William W Stoops, Lon R Hays, Paul E A Glaser, Craig R Rush

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Agonist Medications for the Treatment of Cocaine Use Disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erika PikeFrom the Departments of *Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, †Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, ‡Psychiatry, and §Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
William W Stoops
Lon R Hays
Paul E A Glaser
Craig R Rush
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
Agonist Replacement Therapy for Methamphetamine Dependence: Human Lab StudiesR01DA025032 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
GABAA Modulation as a Target for Developing Medications for Methamphetamine AbuseR01DA025591 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025032NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agonist replacement may be a viable treatment approach for managing stimulant use disorders. This study sought to determine the effects of D-amphetamine maintenance on methamphetamine self-administration in stimulant using human participants. We predicted that D-amphetamine maintenance would reduce methamphetamine self-administration. Eight participants completed the protocol, which tested 2 D-amphetamine maintenance conditions in counterbalanced order (0 and 40 mg/d). Participants completed 4 experimental sessions under each maintenance condition in which they first sampled 1 of 4 doses of intranasal methamphetamine (0, 10, 20, or 30 mg). Participants then had the opportunity to respond on a computerized progressive-ratio task to earn portions of the sampled methamphetamine dose. Subject-rated drug effect and physiological measures were completed at regular intervals prior to and after sampling methamphetamine. Methamphetamine was self-administered as an orderly function of dose regardless of the maintenance condition. Methamphetamine produced prototypical subject-rated effects on 12 items of the drug-effects questionnaires, 8 of which were attenuated by D-amphetamine maintenance (eg, increased ratings were attenuated on items such as Any Effect, Like Drug, and Willing to Take Again on the Drug Effect Questionnaire). Methamphetamine produced significant increases in systolic blood pressure, which were attenuated by D-amphetamine maintenance compared to placebo maintenance. Methamphetamine was well tolerated during D-amphetamine maintenance and no adverse events occurred. Although D-amphetamine attenuated some subject-rated effects of methamphetamine, the self-administration results are concordant with those of clinical trials showing that D-amphetamine did not reduce methamphetamine use. Unique pharmacological approaches may be needed for treating amphetamine use disorders.

Indexed as

AdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersDelayed-Action PreparationsDextroamphetamineDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMaleMethamphetamineMiddle AgedSelf AdministrationSelf CareDelayed-Action PreparationsDextroamphetamineMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID25154010
PMCPMC4239155
OpenAlexW2321347241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.