Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25153314›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Sedentary behavior and incident cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Dong Shen, Weidong Mao, Tao Liu, Qingfeng Lin, Xiangdong Lu, Qiong Wang, Feng Lin, Ulf Ekelund, Katrien Wijndaele

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Modelling the potential health and economic benefits of reducing population sitting time in Australia.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  10. A Cost and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work) Intervention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. The economic costs of excessive sedentary behaviour in Japan.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Association of lifestyle factors with breast cancer incidence: An overview of systematic reviews.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  20. Cancer Risk Perceptions in South Australia: A Descriptive Analysis of a Population Survey.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dong ShenDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China.
Weidong MaoDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China.
Tao LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China.
Qingfeng LinDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China.
Xiangdong LuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China.
Qiong WangDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China.
Feng LinDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway; MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Katrien WijndaeleMRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jiangyin People's Hospital · CNSoutheast University · CNMRC Epidemiology Unit · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/12/58/29709Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedentary behavior is ubiquitous in modern adults' daily lives and it has been suggested to be associated with incident cancer. However, the results have been inconsistent. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to clarify the association between sedentary behavior and incident cancer.

methodPubMed and Embase databases were searched up to March 2014. All prospective cohort studies on the association between sedentary behavior and incident cancer were included. The summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random effect model.

resultsA total of 17 prospective studies from 14 articles, including a total of 857,581 participants and 18,553 cases, were included in the analysis for sedentary behavior and risk of incident cancer. The overall meta-analysis suggested that sedentary behavior increased risk of cancer (RR = 1.20, 95%CI = 1.12-1.28), with no evidence of heterogeneity between studies (I(2) = 7.3%, P = 0.368). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that there were statistical associations between sedentary behavior and some cancer types (endometrial cancer: RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.08-1.53; colorectal cancer: RR = 1.30, 95%CI = 1.12-1.49; breast cancer: RR = 1.17, 95%CI = 1.03-1.33; lung cancer: RR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.06-1.52). However, there was no association of sedentary behavior with ovarian cancer (RR = 1.26, 95%CI = 0.87-1.82), renal cell carcinoma (RR = 1.11, 95%CI = 0.87-1.41) or non-Hodgkin lymphoid neoplasms (RR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.82-1.43).

conclusionThe present meta-analysis suggested that prolonged sedentary behavior was independently associated with an increased risk of incident endometrial, colorectal, breast, and lung cancers, but not with ovarian cancer, renal cell carcinoma or non-Hodgkin lymphoid neoplasms.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorHumansIncidenceNeoplasmsProspective StudiesRiskRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25153314
PMCPMC4143275
OpenAlexW2067732135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.