Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25153077›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Habituation to experimentally induced electrical pain during voluntary-breathing controlled electrical stimulation (BreEStim).

Shengai Li, Tracy Hu, Maria A Beran, Sheng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shengai LiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America; Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory TIRR Memorial Hermann Research Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Tracy HuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America; Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory TIRR Memorial Hermann Research Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Maria A BeranDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America; Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory TIRR Memorial Hermann Research Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Sheng LiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America; Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory TIRR Memorial Hermann Research Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Memorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation · US

Funding

The Respiratory-motor CouplingR01NS060774 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LI, SHENG · 2009 to 2012
$894k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060774NINDS NIH HHS R01NS060774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePainful peripheral electrical stimulation to acupuncture points was found to cause sensitization if delivered randomly (EStim), but induced habituation if triggered by voluntary breathing (BreEStim). The objective was to systematically compare the effectiveness of BreEStim and EStim and to investigate the possible mechanisms mediating the habituation effect of BreEStim.

methodsEleven pain-free, healthy subjects (6 males, 5 females) participated in the study. Each subject received the BreEStim and EStim treatments in a random order at least three days apart. Both treatments consisted of 120 painful but tolerable stimuli to the ulnar nerve at the elbow on the dominant arm. BreEStim was triggered by voluntary breathing while EStim was delivered randomly. Electrical sensation threshold (EST) and electrical pain threshold (EPT) were measured from the thenar and hypothenar eminences on both hands at pre-intervention and 10-minutes post-intervention.

resultsThere was no difference in the pre-intervention baseline measurement of EST and EPT between BreEStim and EStim. BreEStim increased EPT in all tested sites on both hands, while EStim increased EPT in the dominant hypothenar eminence distal to the stimulating site and had no effect on EPT in other sites. There was no difference in the intensity of electrical stimulation between EStim and BreEStim.

conclusionOur findings support the important role human voluntary breathing plays in the systemic habituation effect of BreEStim to peripheral painful electrical stimulation.

Indexed as

Habituation, PsychophysiologicPain ThresholdRespirationAcupuncture PointsAdultElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMalePain

Identifiers

PMID25153077
PMCPMC4143193
OpenAlexW2073884486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.