Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25153037›Full record

ArticleZebrafish2014

High-throughput analysis of behavior in zebrafish larvae: effects of feeding.

Danielle Clift, Holly Richendrfer, Robert J Thorn, Ruth M Colwill, Robbert Creton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zebrafish, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Target the Heart: A New Axis of Alzheimer's Disease Prevention.Journal of dementia and alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Drug repurposing for neurodegenerative diseases using Zebrafish behavioral profiles.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle Clift1 Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island.
Holly Richendrfer
Robert J Thorn
Ruth M Colwill
Robbert Creton
Brown University · US

Funding

Vapor Pressures and Thermodynamic Properties of Complex Organic MixturesP42ES013660 · NIEHS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BOEKELHEIDE, KIM, HURT, ROBERT H. · 2005 to 2020
$37.7M
TRAINING IN MOLECULAR &CELL BIOLOGY &BIOCHEMISTRYT32GM007601 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MOWRY, KIMBERLY L. · 1985 to 2019
$6.4M
Brain defects induced by embryonic exposure to modulators of calcium signalingR01HD060647 · NICHD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CRETON, ROBBERT J · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
The effects of organophosphates on anxiety-related behavior and neurodevelopmentF32ES021342 · NIEHS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RICHENDRFER, HOLLY · 2012 to 2014
$163k
Zebrafish Model of Hyperactivity Induced by Embryonic Exposure to PCBsR03ES017755 · NIEHS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI COLWILL, RUTH M · 2010 to 2011
$145k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060647NIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES021342NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES013660NIEHS NIH HHS R03 ES017755NIEHS NIH HHS R03ES017755NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early brain development can be influenced by numerous genetic and environmental factors, with long-lasting effects on brain function and behavior. Identification of these factors is facilitated by high-throughput analyses of behavior in zebrafish larvae, which can be imaged in multiwell or multilane plates. However, the nutritional needs of zebrafish larvae during the behavioral experiments are not fully understood. Zebrafish larvae begin feeding between 4 and 5 days postfertilization (dpf), but can live solely on nutrients derived from the yolk until at least 7 dpf. To examine whether feeding affects behavior, we measured a broad range of behaviors with and without feeding at 5, 6, and 7 dpf. We found that feeding did not have a significant effect on behavior in 5-day-old larvae. In contrast, fed 6- and 7-day-old larvae displayed increased avoidance responses to visual stimuli, increased swim speeds, and decreased resting in comparison to unfed larvae. In addition, the fed 7-day-old larvae displayed a decrease in thigmotaxis and a decrease in the distance between larvae in the presence of visual stimuli. Thus, feeding affects a range of behaviors in 6- and 7-day-old larvae. We conclude that 5-day-old larvae are well-suited for high-throughput analyses of behavior, since effects of feeding can be avoided at this time. For high-throughput analyses of behavior in older larvae, standard feeding protocols need to be developed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalFeeding MethodsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysPhotic StimulationTime FactorsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID25153037
PMCPMC4172468
OpenAlexW1958877729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.