Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25152776›Full record

ArticleNanoethics2014

Specificity and Engagement: Increasing ELSI's Relevance to Nano-Scientists.

Barry L Shumpert, Amy K Wolfe, David J Bjornstad, Stephanie Wang, Maria Fernanda Campa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoethics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barry L ShumpertOak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6038 USA.
Amy K WolfeOak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6038 USA.
David J BjornstadOak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6038 USA.
Stephanie WangHigher Education Research Experiences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory Program, Oak Ridge, TN USA.
Maria Fernanda CampaBredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scholars studying the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) associated with emerging technologies maintain the importance of considering these issues throughout the research and development cycle, even during the earliest stages of basic research. Embedding these considerations within the scientific process requires communication between ELSI scholars and the community of physical scientists who are conducting that basic research. We posit that this communication can be effective on a broad scale only if it links societal issues directly to characteristics of the emerging technology that are relevant to the physical and natural scientists involved in research and development. In this article, we examine nano-ELSI literature from 2003 to 2010 to discern the degree to which it makes these types of explicit connections. We find that, while the literature identifies a wide range of issues of societal concern, it generally does so in a non-specific manner. It neither links societal issues to particular forms or characteristics of widely divergent nanotechnologies nor to any of the many potential uses to which those nanotechnologies may be put. We believe that these kinds of specificity are essential to those engaged in nano-scale research. We also compare the literature-based findings to observations from interviews we conducted with nanoscientists and conclude that ELSI scholars should add technical- and application-related forms of specificity to their work and their writings to enhance effectiveness and impact in communicating with one important target audience-members of the nanoscale science community.

Indexed as

Emerging technologiesEthical, legal, and social issuesNano-ELSI literatureNanoscience

Identifiers

PMID25152776
PMCPMC4129220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.