ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2014
Patient-reported outcomes in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The minimal important difference in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An analysis of double-blind SSRI trials in adults.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024Article
- Neuroablative Intervention for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Psychiatry investigation · 2023Article
- Sexual Obsessions in a Patient With Schizophrenia.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Development of a Quality-of-Life Survey for Patients With Succinic Semialdehyde Dehydrogenase Deficiency, a Rare Disorder of GABA Metabolism.Journal of child neurology · 2021Article
- Explanatory Factors for Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life in Women with Anorexia Nervosa.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Perceived physical health in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Course and outcome of obsessive-compulsive disorder.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2019Review
- Obsessive belief and emotional appraisal correlates of symptom dimensions and impairment in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Indian journal of psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the article was to provide an overview of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and related measures that have been examined in the context of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The current review focused on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that evaluated three broad outcome domains: functioning, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and OCD-related symptoms. The present review ultimately included a total of 155 unique articles and 22 PROMs. An examination of the PROs revealed that OCD patients tend to suffer from significant functional disability, and report lower HRQoL than controls. OCD patients report greater symptom severity than patients with other mental disorders and evidence indicates that PROMs are sensitive to change and may be even better than clinician-rated measures at predicting treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, it should be noted that the measures reviewed lacked patient input in their development. Future research on PROMs must involve patient perspectives and include rigorous psychometric evaluation of these measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25152661PMC4140516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.