ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2014
Assessment of patient-reported symptoms of anxiety.
Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies exploring prevalence of non-specific anxiety in undergraduate university students.BMC psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Anxiety prevalence following spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis.Spinal cord · 2016Pooled it
- Comparison of patient and partner quality of life and health outcomes in the first year after an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).Journal of behavioral medicine · 2016Trial
- Exploring New Frontiers in Pharmacological Treatment of Depression: A Review on Recent Advances.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Central obesity and its association with youth physical and mental health: evidence from the Australian National Health Survey.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Motivational interviewing for improving functional and psychosocial outcomes among stroke survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Global prevalence of insomnia symptoms in undergraduate university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Models to Identify Clinically Significant Anxiety in Short-Term Insomnia Using Accelerometers.Depression and anxiety · 2025Article
- [Validation of subjective complaints: differential diagnosis of "healthy suffering" using fatigue as an example].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Review
- The Impact of Cannabidiol Treatment on Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Adolescent anxiety and depression: perspectives of network analysis and longitudinal network analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Article
- Responsiveness and clinically important differences of the PROMIS short form-depression 8a, anxiety 8a, and PASS-20 in individuals with chronic low back pain.Pain reports · 2024Article
- Identity Disturbance in the Digital Era during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Adverse Effects of Social Media and Job Stress.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Implementing paper-based patient-reported outcome collection within outpatient integrative health and medicine.PloS one · 2024Article
- CENTRAL SENSITIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Review
- Evaluating Drivers of the Patient Experience Triangle: Stress, Anxiety, and Frustration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The Difficult Path to the Discovery of Novel Treatments in Psychiatric Disorders.Advances in neurobiology · 2023Article
- The Role of Job Insecurity, Social Media Exposure, and Job Stress in Predicting Anxiety Among White-Collar Employees.Psychology research and behavior management · 2023Article
- Common measures or common metrics? A plea to harmonize measurement results.Clinical psychology & psychotherapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient self-reported symptoms are of crucial importance to identify anxiety disorders, as well as to monitor their treatment in clinical practice and research. Thus, for evidence-based medicine, a precise, reliable, and valid (ie, "objective") assessment of the patient's reported "subjective" symptoms is warranted. There is a plethora of instruments available, which can provide psychometrically sound assessments of anxiety, but there are several limitations of current tools that need to be carefully considered for their successful use. Nevertheless, the empirical assessment of mental health status is not as accepted in medicine as is the assessment of biomarkers. One reason for this may be that different instruments assessing the same psychological construct use different scales. In this paper we present some new developments that promise to provide one common metric for the assessment of anxiety, to facilitate the general acceptance of mental health assessments in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25152658PMC4140513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.