Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25152638›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2014

Video- or text-based e-learning when teaching clinical procedures? A randomized controlled trial.

Steen Vigh Buch, Frederik Philip Treschow, Jesper Brink Svendsen, Bjarne Skjødt Worm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The electronic media and the study profile of the surgical resident.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steen Vigh BuchDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederik Philip TreschowDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper Brink SvendsenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bjarne Skjødt WormDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThis study investigated the effectiveness of two different levels of e-learning when teaching clinical skills to medical students. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty medical students were included and randomized into two comparable groups. The groups were given either a video- or text/picture-based e-learning module and subsequently underwent both theoretical and practical examination. A follow-up test was performed 1 month later.

resultsThe students in the video group performed better than the illustrated text-based group in the practical examination, both in the primary test (P<0.001) and in the follow-up test (P<0.01). Regarding theoretical knowledge, no differences were found between the groups on the primary test, though the video group performed better on the follow-up test (P=0.04).

conclusionVideo-based e-learning is superior to illustrated text-based e-learning when teaching certain practical clinical skills.

Indexed as

clinical skillse-learningmedicinevideo versus text

Identifiers

PMID25152638
PMCPMC4140394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.