Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25152473›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2014

The challenge of achieving 1% operative mortality for coronary artery bypass grafting: a multi-institution Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database analysis.

Damien J LaPar, Giovanni Filardo, Ivan K Crosby, Alan M Speir, Jeffrey B Rich, Irving L Kron, Gorav Ailawadi

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Commentary: When will the robots come marching in?Journal of cardiac surgery · 2021
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Physiology ofWorld journal of cardiology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Damien J LaParDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.
Giovanni FilardoInstitute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Research Institute and Department of Statistical Science, Dallas, Tex.
Ivan K CrosbyDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.
Alan M SpeirInova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Va.
Jeffrey B RichSentara Heart Hospital, Norfolk, Va.
Irving L KronDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.
Gorav AilawadiDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va. Electronic address: gorav@virginia.edu.

Funding

Network for Cardiothoracic Surgical Investigations in Cardiovascular MedicineUM1HL088925 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BADHWAR, VINAY, KRON, IRVING L. · 2013 to 2025
$6.8M
Network for Cardiothoracic Surgical Investigations in Cardiovascular MedicineU01HL088925 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KRON, IRVING L. · 2007 to 2013
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL088925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCardiothoracic surgical leadership recently challenged the surgical community to achieve an operative mortality rate of 1.0% for the performance of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The possibility of achieving this goal remains unknown due to the increasing number of high-risk patients being referred for CABG. The purpose of our study was to identify a patient population in which this operative mortality goal is achievable relative to the estimated operative risk.

methodsPatient records from a multi-institution (17 centers) Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database for primary, isolated CABG operations (2001-2012) were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression modeling with spline functions for calculated STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) was used to rigorously assess the relationship between estimated patient risk and operative mortality, adjusted for operative year and surgeon volume.

resultsA total of 34,416 patients (average patient age, 63.9 ± 10.7 years; 27% [n = 9190] women) incurred an operative mortality rate of 1.87%. Median STS predicted risk of mortality was 1.06% (interquartile range, 0.60%-2.13%) and median surgeon CABG volume was 544 (interquartile range, 303-930) operations over the study period. After risk adjustment for the confounding influence of surgeon volume and operative year, the association between STS PROM and operative mortality was highly significant (P < .0001). More importantly, the adjusted spline function revealed that an STS PROM threshold value of 1.27% correlated with a 1.0% probability of death, accounting for 57.3% (n = 19,720) of the total study population. Further, the STS PROM demonstrated a limited predictive capacity for operative mortality for STS PROM > 25% as observed to expected mortality began to diverge.

conclusionsAchieving the goal of 1.0% operative mortality for primary, isolated CABG is feasible in appropriately selected patients in the modern surgical era. However, this goal may be achieved in only 60% of CABG patients without other improvements in processes of care. Calculated STS PROM can be used to strongly identify patients with estimated mortality risk <1.27% to achieve this goal, but it appears limited in its predictive capacity for those patients with estimated risk >25.0%. These data provide a foundation for further study to determine if 1.0% mortality for CABG is achievable nationwide.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareAgedChi-Square DistributionCoronary Artery BypassDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID25152473
PMCPMC4764380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.