Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25151623›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2014

Range of motion (ROM) restriction influences quipazine-induced stepping behavior in postnatal day one and day ten rats.

Misty M Strain, Michele R Brumley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Misty M StrainDepartment of Psychology, Idaho State University, 921 S 8th Ave, Stop 8112 Pocatello, ID 83209-8112, USA.
Michele R BrumleyDepartment of Psychology, Idaho State University, 921 S 8th Ave, Stop 8112 Pocatello, ID 83209-8112, USA. Electronic address: brummich@isu.edu.
Idaho State University · US

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Carolyn Hovde Bohach · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
UNDERGRADUATE COLLEGE OUTREACH PROGRAMP20RR016454 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI HOVDE, CAROLYN J · 2001 to 2011
$35.3M
Experiential modulation of action patterns in the developing ratR15HD062980 · NICHD · IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRUMLEY, MICHELE R. · 2010 to 2010
$165k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016454NICHD NIH HHS 1R15HD062980-01NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD062980NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103408PHS HHS P20FRR016454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that neonatal rats can adapt their stepping behavior in response to sensory feedback in real-time. The current study examined real-time and persistent effects of ROM (range of motion) restriction on stepping in P1 and P10 rats. On the day of testing, rat pups were suspended in a sling. After a 5-min baseline, they were treated with the serotonergic receptor agonist quipazine (3.0mg/kg) or saline (vehicle control). Half of the pups had a Plexiglas plate placed beneath them at 50% of limb length to induce a period of ROM restriction during stepping. The entire test session included a 5-min baseline, 15-min ROM restriction, and 15-min post-ROM restriction periods. Following treatment with quipazine, there was an increase in both fore- and hindlimb total movement and alternated steps in P1 and P10 pups. P10 pups also showed more synchronized steps than P1 pups. During the ROM restriction period, there was a suppression of forelimb movement and synchronized steps. We did not find evidence of persistent effects of ROM restriction on the amount of stepping. However, real-time and persistent changes in intralimb coordination occurred. Developmental differences also were seen in the time course of stepping between P1 and P10 pups, with P10 subjects showing show less stepping than younger pups. These results suggest that sensory feedback modulates locomotor activity during the period of development in which the neural mechanisms of locomotion are undergoing rapid development.

Indexed as

AgingRestraint, PhysicalAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornExtremitiesLocomotionMaleQuipazineRange of Motion, ArticularRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySerotonin Receptor AgonistsQuipazineSerotonin Receptor AgonistsDevelopmentLocomotionMotor coordinationSensory feedbackSerotonin

Identifiers

PMID25151623
PMCPMC4179931
OpenAlexW1994416818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.