Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25150738›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2014

Water quality, weather and environmental factors associated with fecal indicator organism density in beach sand at two recreational marine beaches.

Christopher D Heaney, Natalie G Exum, Alfred P Dufour, Kristen P Brenner, Richard A Haugland, Eunice Chern, Kellogg J Schwab, David C Love, Marc L Serre, Rachel Noble and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Risk valuation forHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Climate Change Impacts on Microbiota in Beach Sand and Water: Looking Ahead.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sources and persistence of fecal indicator bacteria andWater, air, and soil pollution · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christopher D HeaneyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA. Electronic address: cheaney@jhsph.edu.
Natalie G ExumDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA.
Alfred P DufourNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268-1593, USA.
Kristen P BrennerNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268-1593, USA.
Richard A HauglandNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268-1593, USA.
Eunice ChernNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268-1593, USA.
Kellogg J SchwabDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA.
David C LoveDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA.
Marc L SerreDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, CB# 7431, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA.
Rachel NobleInstitute of Marine Sciences, CB# 3301, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, NC 28557-3301, USA.
Timothy J WadeEpidemiology Branch, Environmental Public Health Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.

Funding

Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
Non-Invasive Zoonotic Pathogen Exposure & Outcome BiomarkersK01OH010193 · OH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HEANEY, CHRISTOPHER D · 2012 to 2014
$324k
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018NIOSH CDC HHS K01 OH010193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies showing an association between fecal indicator organisms (FIOs) in sand and gastrointestinal (GI) illness among beachgoers with sand contact have important public health implications because of the large numbers of people who recreate at beaches and engage in sand contact activities. Yet, factors that influence fecal pollution in beach sand remain unclear. During the 2007 National Epidemiological and Environmental Assessment of Recreational (NEEAR) Water Study, sand samples were collected at three locations (60 m apart) on weekend days (Sat, Sun) and holidays between June and September at two marine beaches - Fairhope Beach, AL and Goddard Beach, RI - with nearby publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs) outfalls. F(+) coliphage, enterococci, Bacteroidales, fecal Bacteroides spp., and Clostridium spp. were measured in sand using culture and qPCR-based calibrator-cell equivalent methods. Water samples were also collected on the same days, times and transects as the 144 sand samples and were assayed using the same FIO measurements. Weather and environmental data were collected at the time of sample collection. Mean FIO concentrations in sand varied over time, but not space. Enterococci CFU and CCE densities in sand were not correlated, although other FIOs in sand were. The strongest correlation between FIO density in sand and water was fecal Bacteroides CCE, followed by enterococci CFU, Clostridium spp. CCE, and Bacteroidales CCE. Overall, the factors associated with FIO concentrations in sand were related to the sand-water interface (i.e., sand-wetting) and included daily average densities of FIOs in water, rainfall, and wave height. Targeted monitoring that focuses on daily trends of sand FIO variability, combined with information about specific water quality, weather, and environmental factors may inform beach monitoring and management decisions to reduce microbial burdens in beach sand. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Indexed as

RecreationWater MicrobiologyBacteroidesBacteroidetesBathing BeachesColiphagesEnterococcusFecesSeawaterUnited StatesWater QualityBeach sandEnterococciFecal pollutionqPCRRainfallWater quality

Identifiers

PMID25150738
PMCPMC4523396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.