Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25150258›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2014

Anti-CD22 90Y-epratuzumab tetraxetan combined with anti-CD20 veltuzumab: a phase I study in patients with relapsed/refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Thomas E Witzig, Michael B Tomblyn, Jamal G Misleh, Ebenezer A Kio, Robert M Sharkey, William A Wegener, David M Goldenberg

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CD22 as a Target for Hematological Malignancies and Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Current Status of Molecularly Targeted Therapeutics in Blood Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Molecular pharmaceutics · 2020
    Article
  9. Lymphoma: current status of clinical and preclinical imaging with radiolabeled antibodies.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radioimmunotherapy of human tumours.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas E WitzigMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Michael B TomblynH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Jamal G MislehHelen F Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE.
Ebenezer A KioIndiana University Health Center for Cancer Care, Goshen, IN.
Robert M SharkeyImmunomedics, Morris Plains, NJ.
William A WegenerImmunomedics, Morris Plains, NJ.
David M GoldenbergImmunomedics, Morris Plains, NJ Garden State Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Morris Plains, NJ, USA dmg.gscancer@att.net.
Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology · USGoshen Health · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lingering criticism of radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma is the use of cold anti-CD20 antibody along with the radiolabeled anti-CD20 antibody. We instead combined radioimmunotherapy with immunotherapy targeting different B-cell antigens. We evaluated the anti-CD22 (90)Y-epratuzumab tetraxetan with the anti-CD20 veltuzumab in patients with aggressive lymphoma in whom at least one prior standard treatment had failed, but who had not undergone stem cell transplantation. Eighteen patients (median age 73 years, median of 3 prior treatments) received 200 mg/m(2) veltuzumab once-weekly for 4 weeks, with (90)Y-epratuzumab tetraxetan at planned doses in weeks 3 and 4, and (111)In-epratuzumab tetraxetan in week 2 for imaging and dosimetry. Veltuzumab effectively lowered levels of B cells in the blood prior to the radioimmunotherapy doses. No significant immunogenicity or change in pharmacokinetics of either agent occurred in combination. (111)In imaging showed tumor targeting with acceptable radiation dosimetry to normal organs. For (90)Y-epratuzumab tetraxetan, transient myelosuppression was dose-limiting with 6 mCi/m(2) (222 MBq/m(2)) × 2 being the maximal tolerated dose. Of 17 assessable patients, nine (53%) had objective responses according to the 2007 revised treatment response criteria, including three (18%) complete responses (2 relapsing after 11 and 13 months, 1 continuing to be clinically disease-free at 19 months), and six (35%) partial responses (1 relapsing after 14 months, 5 at 3 - 7 months). Responses occurred in patients with different lymphoma histologies, treated at different (90)Y dose levels, and with a predicted risk of poor outcome, most importantly including five of the six patients treated with the maximal tolerated dose (2 of whom achieved durable complete responses). In conclusion, the combination of (90)Y-epratuzumab tetraxetan and veltuzumab was well-tolerated with encouraging therapeutic activity in this difficult-to-treat population.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBone MarrowDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIndium RadioisotopesLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadioimmunotherapyAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsepratuzumabIndium RadioisotopesveltuzumabYttrium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID25150258
PMCPMC4222463
OpenAlexW2110209872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.