Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25150227›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2014

Recognition of U-rich RNA by Hfq from the Gram-positive pathogen Listeria monocytogenes.

Alexander R Kovach, Kirsten E Hoff, John T Canty, Jillian Orans, Richard G Brennan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Hfq chaperone brings speed dating to bacterial sRNA.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hfq: the flexible RNA matchmaker.Current opinion in microbiology · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Multicomponent mixtures for cryoprotection and ligand solubilization.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander R KovachDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27110, USA.
Kirsten E HoffDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27110, USA.
John T CantyDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27110, USA.
Jillian OransDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27110, USA.
Richard G BrennanDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27110, USA richard.brennan@duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

Structural Biology and Biphysics Training ProgramT32GM008487 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI OAS, TERRENCE GILBERT · 1994 to 2014
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32 GM008487NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hfq is a post-transcriptional regulator that binds U- and A-rich regions of sRNAs and their target mRNAs to stimulate their annealing in order to effect translation regulation and, often, to alter their stability. The functional importance of Hfq and its RNA-binding properties are relatively well understood in Gram-negative bacteria, whereas less is known about the RNA-binding properties of this riboregulator in Gram-positive species. Here, we describe the structure of Hfq from the Gram-positive pathogen Listeria monocytogenes in its RNA-free form and in complex with a U6 oligoribonucleotide. As expected, the protein takes the canonical hexameric toroidal shape of all other known Hfq structures. The U6 RNA binds on the "proximal face" in a pocket formed by conserved residues Q9, N42, F43, and K58. Additionally residues G5 and Q6 are involved in protein-nucleic and inter-subunit contacts that promote uracil specificity. Unlike Staphylococcus aureus (Sa) Hfq, Lm Hfq requires magnesium to bind U6 with high affinity. In contrast, the longer oligo-uridine, U16, binds Lm Hfq tightly in the presence or absence of magnesium, thereby suggesting the importance of additional residues on the proximal face and possibly the lateral rim in RNA interaction. Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence quenching (TFQ) studies reveal, surprisingly, that Lm Hfq can bind (GU)3G and U6 on its proximal and distal faces, indicating a less stringent adenine-nucleotide specificity site on the distal face as compared to the Gram-positive Hfq proteins from Sa and Bacillus subtilis and suggesting as yet uncharacterized RNA-binding modes on both faces.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAmino Acid MotifsCrystallography, X-RayFluorescence PolarizationHost Factor 1 ProteinListeria monocytogenesMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationRNA, MessengerRNA, Small NuclearTryptophanHost Factor 1 ProteinRNA, MessengerRNA, Small NuclearTryptophanU6 small nuclear RNAHfqListeria monocytogenespost-transcription regulatorRNA bindingstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID25150227
PMCPMC4174437
OpenAlexW2096538916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.