Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25150068›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2014

Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

K A Binkley, E S Webber, D D Powers, H C Cromwell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clicker Training Mice for Improved Compliance in the Catwalk Test.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K A BinkleyDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, United States.
E S WebberDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, United States.
D D PowersDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, United States.
H C CromwellDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, United States. Electronic address: hcc@bgsu.edu.
Bowling Green State University · US

Funding

Basal ganglia and relative reward effectR15MH091016 · NIMH · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROMWELL, HOWARD CASEY · 2010 to 2010
$412k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH091016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incentive contrast effects include changes in behavioral responses after a reward upshift (positive contrast) or downshift (negative contrast). Proposed influences on these behavioral changes are emotional state reactions after experiencing or anticipating a change in reward outcome. Rat ultrasonic vocalizations have been shown to be indicators of emotional state during behavior and anticipatory periods. The objective of the present study was to monitor rodent ultrasounds during incentive contrast using a classical runway procedure called instrumental successive negative contrast. The procedure is one that has been used often to examine incentive relativity because of its reliability in measuring negative contrast effects. Rats were trained to run in the alleyway to receive a high (12 pellets) or low magnitude (1 pellet) outcome. The high magnitude was then shifted to the low and running speeds in the alleyway for the reward and USV emission were compared. Replicating previous work, a negative contrast effect was observed with postshift running speeds significantly slower in the shifted group compared to the unshifted group. USVs did not follow the same pattern with an apparent lack of significant differences between the groups following the reward downshift. We also tested another group of animals using a visual predictive cue in the same runway test. When visual cues predicted high or low magnitude outcome, no incentive contrast was found for the running speeds following an outcome downshift, but a weak contrast effect was observed for the USV emission. These results demonstrate a separation between USVs and behavioral indicators of incentive contrast suggesting that concomitant shifts in negative affect may not be necessary for anticipatory relative reward processes.

Indexed as

CuesRewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalEmotionsMaleMotivationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVocalization, AnimalCommunicationEmotionExpectancyIncentive contrastMotivation

Identifiers

PMID25150068
PMCPMC4176516
OpenAlexW1997236481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.